Search for: "State v. Primes" Results 61 - 80 of 2,967
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2015, 6:30 am by Francisco Macías
So begins the Conclusion of the United States District Court, Southern District of California, Central Division in the case of Méndez v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 9:19 pm
So do you agree that marriage is a question reserved for the states to decide based on Baker v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 9:04 am
Today's advance release landlord/tenant law opinion: Prime Management, LLC v. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 11:10 pm
All of this would equally apply to a contingency at the State level, like the one which V Venkatesan points out. [read post]
4 May 2019, 12:39 pm by MOTP
  In addition, although the card agreement states that Citibank may increase the annual percentage rates on all balances to a default rate of up to 19.99% plus the applicable prime rate, nothing in the evidence establishes what the applicable prime rate was for the relevant time periods on the statements. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 7:49 am
The Ninth Circuit panel substituted a new opinion in USA v Lazarenko, April 10, 2009. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 8:16 am by ASAD KHAN
In her Christmas speech to British forces in Akrotiri, the prime minister celebrated the downfall of ISIS. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 7:55 am by Bankruptcy Attorney
 Although the parties agreed that the "prime-plus" formula established for all chapter 13 cases in Till v. [read post]