Search for: "State v. Simpson" Results 61 - 80 of 729
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2006, 4:35 pm
The ruling comes four months after Simpson struck down the provision requiring any wine to be purchased in state, then shipped. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 12:44 pm
United States, 110 S.Ct 668 (1990)). [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 6:32 pm
SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT -- STATEMENT -- PREDIWAVE V. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 3:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In Simpson v Alter ;2010 NY Slip Op 08089 ;Decided on November 9, 2010 ;Appellate Division, Second Department the Court answers this question:   "The Supreme Court also properly denied that branch of the appellants' motion which was to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7). [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:49 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In Simpson v Alter ;2010 NY Slip Op 08089 ;Decided on November 9, 2010 ;Appellate Division, Second Department  the Court answers this question:   "The Supreme Court also properly denied that branch of the appellants' motion which was to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7). [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 11:56 am
Simpson III upholds a state law set to take effect in January, but eliminates the requirement that someone purchase the wine in person before it is shipped.Included in the entry is a link to the 36-page opinion in Cherry Hill Vineyards v. [read post]