Search for: "Steinberger v. Steinberger" Results 61 - 80 of 376
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2020, 9:29 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
These Opinion Letters extend a trend toward the flexible application of the OSE that accords with the Supreme Court’s analysis in Christopher v. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
L’ARC ne commet pas une faute du simple fait qu’elle adopte une opinion qui se révèle par la suite erronée. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 5:54 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Right of Refusal 10:45- 11:10 AM; 11:15- 11:40 AM; 11:45- 12:10 PM Speakers: Michele Oberholtzer, Director of Tax Foreclosure Prevention, United Community Housing Coalition and Eli Savit, Senior Advisor to Detroit Mayor Mike Duggan Changes in the Detroit Real Estate Market  10:45- 11:10 AM; 11:15- 11:40 AM; 11:45- 12:10 PM Speaker: Joshua Akers, Assistant Professor of Geography and Urban & Regional Studies, University of Michigan-Dearborn MorningSide… [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
A separate cause of action for punitive damages is not legally cognizable (see Steinberg v Monasch, 85 AD2d 403, 406 [1st Dept 1982]). [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 12:27 pm by Chris Castle
 (For those reading along at home, Wixen is represented by badass David Steinberg, so good luck Pandora.) [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 6:20 am
., on Thursday, April 11, 2019 Tags: Compensation ratios, Equity-based compensation, Executive Compensation, Incentives, Management, Pay for performance The SEC v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 6:33 am
In my recently published book, The Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 7:05 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Dudzinski Parental Decision Making and the Limitations of the Equivalence Thesis (and the Harm Principle)Aaron Wightman & Dougals Diekema Withdrawing and Withholding in the Clinical ArenaKristin Furfari & Jean AbbottPages: 45-47 | DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2018.1563658 Dangers of Withholding Treatment in Emergency and Prehospital SettingsKenneth V. [read post]
The Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (“OPR”) has spent five years drafting a comprehensive update to 30 sections of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) Guidelines.[1] The updated text[2] (“Final Text”) ensures the Guidelines are consistent with recent court decisions, implements legislative changes, clarifies rules governing the CEQA process, and eliminates duplicative analysis. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 3:59 am by Administrator
Les demandeurs Ludmer et Steinberg (décédé en cours d’instance), les liquidateurs de la succession de ce dernier et les entreprises demanderesses, appartenant à Ludmer, à Steinberg ou à des membres de leurs familles et possédant des actions dans SLT ou en recevant des dividendes, soutiennent que la conduite de l’ARC dans le cours de la vérification était abusive et qu’elle a nui à leurs… [read post]