Search for: "Stone v. Powell"
Results 61 - 80
of 94
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2007, 10:49 am
See also Bakke, supra, at 312, 313 (opinion of Powell, J.). [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
Only in the 1940s did Chief Justice Stone resuscitate the nationalist use of McCulloch, with assists from historians Thomas Reed Powell and Charles Beard. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 4:31 pm
Reserved Judgments George v Cannell, heard on 14 June 2022 (Underhill V-P, Warby and Snowden LLJ) The Duke of Sussex v Associated Newspaper [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:04 pm
Young, 13-95, yet another state-on-top habeas case (this time from the Second Circuit), concerns a whole slew of habeas fun, but in the main asks whether the state can forfeit application of the old rule from Stone v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 6:23 am
Justice Byron White delivered the opinion of the Court, joined with Chief Justice Burger and Justices Powell, Rehnquist, and O’Connor (Stone, 472). [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 7:53 am
Past winners include Chief Justice Burger and Justices Frankfurter, Holmes, Powell, Marshall, Brennan, O’Connor, and Kennedy. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Preemption, of course, would be The Beatles, and Daubert/Frye the Rolling Stones. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 8:29 am
Young, 13-95, the state-on-top habeas case asking whether (1) a state can forfeit application of the Stone v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 6:49 am
The primary purpose of the exclusionary rule is to “deter future unlawful conduct,” Stone v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 11:09 am
(This is a variant on Judge Friendly's 1970 proposal and an extension of Stone v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 7:24 am
Quon, NASA v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:12 am
In Hess v. [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:36 pm
The witness is actor Yael Stone. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
Young 13-95Issue: (1) Whether the state forfeits an argument that Stone v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 4:39 pm
Stone, eds., Forthcoming, Jack M. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 2:32 pm
In the landmark case of Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 10:57 am
That same week, the Court also ruled in Stone v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:47 pm
Wallace v. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 6:16 am
’” In making that finding, Mehta had quoted the Supreme Court’s strict test for incitement in the landmark case of Brandenberg v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 10:19 am
Stone and William Howard Taft, and Associate Justices William J. [read post]
