Search for: "Taylor v. King" Results 61 - 80 of 174
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2010, 9:42 am by Bruce Nye
  In 2003, a California Appellate Court held that, even if the plaintiff cannot recover damages from the Navy, the Navy is an entity to whom the jury can allocate “fault” (Taylor v. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 9:04 am
Sánchez de Lozada and Mamani, et al. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 12:47 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Taylor, 694 F.3d 650, 655 (6th Cir.2012) (explaining that the service requirement is satisfiedby proper service of process, consent, waiver, or forfeitureby the defendant (first citing Murphy Bros., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 12:57 am by INFORRM
  The judge said that “If one of the late King’s physicians had kept a diary of what he had heard and seen, this Court would not in the King’s lifetime, have permitted him to print or publish it.“ In 1849 the Queen’s consort brought proceedings to restrain the publication of surreptitiously obtained private etchings made by himself and the Queen (Prince Albert v Strange (1848-9) 2 De G & Sm 652). [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 1:49 pm by John Elwood
Cain, 14-10008 (seventh) asks questions about Brady and ineffective assistance of counsel; Taylor v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 6:03 am
Katfriend Henning Grosse Ruse-Khan (University of Cambridge, King’s College and Max Planck Institute), kindly hosted by Eleonora, investigates those really questions in this post.* Galileo sees stars as ESA logo marches on Jeremy reports on the General Court of the European Union’s decision in Case T-450/11 Galileo International Technology LLC v OHIM, the European Commission and the European Space Agency (ESA). [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 3:29 pm
Mr Justice King held: 1. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:40 pm
New York Probate Lawyers said an RF died intestate in December, 1947 and letters of administration were issued to his widow, the respondent, in the same month. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 6:48 pm
New York Probate Lawyer said that RF died intestate in December, 1947 and letters of administration were issued to his widow, the respondent, in the same month. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
On 14 June 2024, the High Court handed down judgement on preliminary issues in the case of Taylor v Pathé Productions Limited & Ors [2024] EWHC 1475 (KB), relating to the 2022 film, ‘The Lost King. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]