Search for: "US Steel Corp. v. Industrial Commission" Results 61 - 73 of 73
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
– section 22 orders (IPKat) IP Court Users’ Committee publishes ‘Working Group’s Consultation on Proposals for Reform of the Patents County Court’ (PatLit) IPO holds ‘trade mark surgery’ (Class 46)   United States US General David Kappos confirmation hearing (IP Watchdog) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Maier & Maier) (Patent Docs) To find out… [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:20 pm
The codes developed following the passage of the NIRA governed many of America's major industrial sectors: lumber, steel, oil, mining, and automobiles. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
(IPKat) CFI: CTM grant not contrary to Portuguese business name ruling: Alberto Jorge Moreira da Fonseca, Lda v OHIM, General Óptica, SA, intervening (Class 46) CFI confirms refusal of Anheuser-Busch’s BUDWEISER Community trade mark: Anheuser-Busch v OHIM - Budejovicky Budvar (Class 46) (IPKat) (Law360) (Out-Law) ACTA negotiation powers for EU Commission (BLOG@IP::JUR) EU sound recording term extension vote delayed (Excess Copyright) EP divisional… [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(Spicy IP)   Italy Pre-emptive remedies in Italy (PatLit)   Japan Fair Trade Commission orders music copyright group to end monopolistic practice (ContentAgenda) (ContentAgenda)   Malawi Are consumers in Malawi just more brand-savvy? [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
(Inventive Step)   US Patent Reform CAFC: PTO control over own proceedings, patent reform: Hyatt v Dudas (Hal Wegner) When considering PTO reform, look to KIPO for clues (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Chamber of Commerce urges IP reform (Patent Baristas) (Patently-O) The message to Barack Obama is clear: the USPTO needs new blood and a strong reform agenda (IAM)   US Patents Patent Prosecution Highway pilot with Canadian Intellectual Property Office… [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 3:57 am
Political flurries and potential trade mark wars (Afro-IP) House arrest for DVD pirate (Afro-IP)   Spain Government to publish ‘Manual of Best Practices in the Prosecution of Infringing Activities’ (Class 46)   Ukraine Trade marks database to be accessible free of charge (Class 46)   United Arab Emirates Limitations on trademark protection (International Law Office)   United Kingdom Financing creative businesses (IP finance) UK patent… [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 11:33 pm
In finding the Section 8(a)(1) discharge, the Board relied on both Wright Line, 251 NLRB 1083 (1980), enfd. 662 F. 2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 989 (1982), and Atlantic Steel/Felix Industries, 245 NLRB 814 (1979) 331 NLRB 144, 144-46 (2000), enf. denied on other grounds and remanded 251 F.3d 1051 (D.C. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
Issue: Whether an Arizona commission violated the free speech rights of an anti-abortion organization by denying its application for a specialty “Choose Life” license plate. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt)   Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal… [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in Viacom… [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Bayer Corp., 398 F.3d 640, 643 (7th Cir. 2005) (applying Illinois law); Thomas v. [read post]