Search for: "United States v. Davis"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,767
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2024, 1:30 pm
(See Thomas Davies's work.) [read post]
6 Nov 2024, 9:01 pm
’”In a similar vein, the Court in Madsen v. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 1:45 am
Ofcom stated that the financial penalty was issued due to the “seriousness and repeated nature of this breach,” and will require the broadcaster to publish a statement of its findings on a date determined by the regulator. [read post]
2 Nov 2024, 9:03 am
Davis v. [read post]
31 Oct 2024, 9:00 pm
If a state can do that, we see no reason why a state cannot decide to treat ballots in the possession of the United States Postal Service (USPS) or similarly reliable common carriers in like fashion. [read post]
28 Oct 2024, 3:30 am
Davis L. [read post]
24 Oct 2024, 6:48 pm
Davis v. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 12:51 pm
The court denied review of just one of the 15 relisted cases that were then pending: Davis v. [read post]
10 Oct 2024, 2:05 pm
United States. [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 10:45 am
In re Chmura, 608 N.W.2d 31 (Mich. 2000); State v. [read post]
8 Oct 2024, 3:07 pm
" Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 12:06 pm
Dobbs v. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 9:01 pm
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 10:02 am
See, e.g., Davies v. [read post]
29 Sep 2024, 12:25 am
Speaking at the United Nations last Sunday, Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama said that the sovereign state would promote moderation, tolerance and peaceful coexistence. [read post]
26 Sep 2024, 9:01 pm
For those who haven’t looked at that Amendment recently, its words provide, quite straightforwardly, that, for citizens of the United States who are at least eighteen, the right to vote “shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any state on account of age” (emphasis added).Indiana, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Texas grant absentee-voting eligibility specifically for all voters sixty-five or older, while… [read post]
24 Sep 2024, 5:01 am
From McMurtrie v. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 1:18 pm
As Judge Stranch explains, prevailing parties under the EAJA are not entitled to fees if "the position of the United States was substantially justified. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 12:59 am
In answer to a written question from Julia Buckley (Shrewsbury, Lab) to the Secretary of State for Justice asking “when her Department plans to publish a response to the Law Commission report entitled Celebrating Marriage: A New Weddings Law, published in July 2022”, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary, Alex Davies-Jones, said this: “We are aware that the Law Commission made recommendations for wholesale change of weddings law in July 2022. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 5:23 am
What is critical is that Judge Cannon crossed way over the line when she refused to follow the decision of the United States Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
