Search for: "United States v. First National Pictures, Inc." Results 61 - 80 of 269
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2013, 4:40 am by Susan Brenner
’ The document further stated, `You are an immigrant not in possession of a valid unexpired immigrant visa, reentry permit, border crossing card, or other valid entry document required by the Immigration and Nationality Act’, and `It is likely that you have engaged or will engage in unauthorized employment in the United States. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
A Short History of State RFRAs The first, federal RFRA, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, was passed by Congress to trump the Supreme Court’s decision in Employment Div. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
  For example, in Tele-Pac, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
  For example, in Tele-Pac, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
  For example, in Tele-Pac, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
This is the proper core of Dalsouple Société Saumuroise Du Caoutchouc v Dalsouple Direct Ltd & Another [2014] EWHC 3963 (Ch), a First of December ruling by Mr Justice Arnold in the Chancery Division of the High Court, England and Wales that Jeremy reports in this post.* Badly behaved politicians, Parliamentary Pirates and a point of copyright principleAmelia Andersdotter, a Swedish politician and former Swedish Pirate Party Member of the European Parliament, drops… [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 11:58 am by Richard Renner
United States Dep’t of Labor, 134 F.3d 1292, 1295 (6th Cir. 1998). [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:40 am by Dennis Crouch
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, et al., No. 15-1314 4. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am by Noah J. Phillips
In American Needle, the Court stripped the National Football League of Section 1 immunity by holding that the NFL is not entitled to the single entity defense under Copperweld and instead, its conduct must be analyzed under the “flexible” rule of reason.[25] And last year, in NCAA v. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
Universal Pictures Corporation, 45 F.2d 119 (2nd Cir. 1930), per Learned Hand J. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 4:10 am by John L. Welch
Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 2:02 pm by Karen Gullo
EFF filed an amicus brief in the case backing Twitter on behalf of two unnamed companies fighting the NSL gag provisions—a case before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit right now. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:58 am by Dennis Crouch
First Quality Baby Products, LLC, et al., No. 15-927 (three amici filed in support) Indefiniteness: The Dow Chemical Company v. [read post]
3 May 2015, 10:33 pm
Sundara Rajan, Professor of Intellectual Property Law, University of Glasgow, depicts a fascinating drama in which the principal actors are two literary ladies and, making a relatively rare appearance centre stage, the United States Postal Service. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
On 29 June 2017 the Culture Secretary Karen Bradley made a statement to the House of Commons stating that she was “minded” to refer the proposed takeover of Sky plc by 21st Century Fox Inc to the Competition and Markets Authority on plurality grounds. [read post]