Search for: "United States v. MacDonald" Results 61 - 80 of 135
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm by Ken White
Campaign Finance: The Supreme Court's 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
MacDonald 12-1490Issue: Whether the Virginia courts unreasonably applied Lawrence v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 8:34 pm by Bill Marler
Bill Neuman wrote yet another article on cheese – “Raw Milk Cheesemakers Fret Over Possible New Rules” – after Food Safety News reported it and in follow-up to my five part series on raw milk and the “60 day rule” – Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4 and Part 5, and the continuing outbreaks, illnesses and recalls linked to raw (unpasteurized) and pasteurized dairy products in the United States. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
Surgidev Corp., 899 P.2d 576, 591 (N.M. 1995) (“evidence of compliance with FDA regulations was properly submitted to the jury for consideration”); United Blood Services v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 5:48 am by Wells Bennett
The Fort Meade CCTV screen comes to life, as your correspondents return for another week of pre-trial proceedings in United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 2:06 pm by familoo
As Justice McReynolds famously said in Pierce v Society of Sisters 268 US 510 (1925), at 535, “The child is not the mere creature of the State”. [read post]
27 Apr 2013, 11:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Wells noted details from a New York Times account of an initial hearing in United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 12:02 pm by Wells Bennett
  And he’s got chops: undergrad at Villanova, medical and doctoral degrees from Georgetown, residencies in the United States and abroad, and a postdoctoral fellowship at Stanford. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm by VALL Blog Master
Choice, v.50, no. 06, February 2013. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm by Rodger Citron
  Ultimately, however, the United States Department of Justice indicted MacDonald, and a jury convicted him after a trial in 1979. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 12:50 pm by Wells Bennett
What, if anything, do developments in the military commission case of United States v. al-Nashiri portend for Al-Nashiri v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 12:29 pm
The '564 Patent '564 Patent - meet your nemesis Claim 1 of the '564 patent entitled "Insecticidal combination effective against fleas on mammals, particularly cats and dogs" claimed the following A composition which provides small mammals with long-lasting protection against fleas, which includes, on the one hand, [fipronil] and, on the other hand, at least one ovicidal compound (B), of insect growth regulator (IGR) type, in a fluid vehicle which is acceptable to the mammal and suitable… [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 6:53 am by Wells Bennett
First, the district court correctly held that plaintiff’s claims are barred by 28 U.S.C. § 2241(e)(2), which bars jurisdiction over any non-habeas action “against the United States or its agents relating to any aspect of the . . . trial . . . of an alien who is . . . detained by the United States and has been determined by the United States to have been properly detained as an enemy combatant.” [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 6:34 am
Larimer of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York issued an opinion denying the defendants' motion to dismiss in Preston v. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 4:34 pm by David Cheifetz
Justice Hugo Jackson wrote about the United States Supreme Court in Brown v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 5:24 am by Benjamin Wittes
When Bruce MacDonald took over, nobody told me I was not chief trial judge any more. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Earlier today, I had the pleasure of visiting Professor Jack Goldsmith’s “Foreign Relations Law” class, which is studying Hamdan v. [read post]