Search for: "United States v. Railroad Company"
Results 61 - 80
of 431
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2015, 9:00 am
Union Pacific Railroad Company, ARB Case No. 13-034. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 7:02 am
United States — imposes taxes on “compensation” paid by railroads to their workers. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 7:46 am
Elaine Goldenberg, representing the United States, which filed an amicus brief in support of neither party, also disagreed with the state’s position on comparison class. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:30 pm
Consider a large forestry company, owning forest land in many states. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:02 pm
United States Department of Transportation (Public Transportation Project - Sacred Places)Union Pacific Railroad Company v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 4:43 am
Co-author Rusty Tucker In Hlavinka v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 3:08 pm
Harriman, the railroad king, to Washington to ask him to raise funds to carry New York state. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 2:53 pm
The court of appeals, citing United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 8:17 pm
United States (U.S., June 21, 2018) (reversing 7th Circuit: Employee stock options are not taxable “compensation” under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act: they are not “money remuneration. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 9:07 pm
In Department of Transportation v. [read post]
Supreme Court Oral Argument in OBB Personenverkehr v. Sachs, a Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act Case
6 Oct 2015, 8:11 am
In Nelson, the plaintiff was recruited in the United States to work for a state-run Saudi Hospital. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 6:36 pm
In CareFlite v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:22 pm
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board might require ALJs to be removable at will, throwing into doubt much of the administrative state’s legitimacy. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:00 am
Erie Railroad Company v Tompkins in a Private International Law ContextMichael S Green4. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 4:19 pm
Comparing (consistent with a stipulation by the railroad and the state) the taxation of the railroad with those of its direct competitors, the court of appeals agreed with the railroad that the tax was discriminatory because the railroad’s competitors do not pay it. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 3:38 pm
United States, No. 16‐3300 (7th Cir. 2017)). [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 7:28 am
United States No. 08-1322, Astrue v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 10:32 am
American Home Assurance Company; Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 2:05 am
It manages railroad track across the eastern United States, including thousands of miles of track in Pennsylvania. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 9:33 am
On September 2, 2014, the Department of Justice announced a settlement in United States v. [read post]
