Search for: "United States v. Seaman" Results 61 - 80 of 205
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2016, 8:24 am
Background Our law firm represents a United States credentialed merchant mariner who was the nominal employee of a security services company named American Guard Services. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 7:23 am by Steven Cohen
United States District Court – Eastern District of Louisiana – February 26th, 2016 – This is a personal injury case where a seaman was injured during his workday on a boat operated by Defendants. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:47 am by Dennis Crouch
The following is a short review of the amicus briefs that have been filed in the case.[3] United States Government When the United States government files and amicus brief, that brief is usually seen as the most important amicus brief in the case. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 11:14 am by Kirby Blanchard
However, The United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals identified an exception. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 7:37 am by Jeremiah N. Johns
De Los Santos, the United States Supreme Court annunciated that a vessel owner owes three narrow duties to a maritime worker for purposes of 905(b). [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:54 am by Steven Boutwell
Earlier this month, Willie Meche filed a writ with the United States Supreme Court not only to overturn the Fifth Circuit’s ruling, but eviscerate McCorpen entirely. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:12 pm by Kraft Palmer Davies, PLLC
Gwinn stated that Hedges was an “excellent candidate” for treatment with an SCS, and referred him to physical medicine and rehabilitation specialist Glen James David, M.D. for a trial SCS. 14. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 7:55 pm by Environmental Law Prof
On March 11, a panel of the Fifth Circuit (Higginbotham, Jones, Prado) issued a decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 12:46 pm by Steven Boutwell
Travelers appealed the decision to the United States Fifth Circuit. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 6:25 am by Joel R. Brandes
The district court found that J.V.O. was habitually resident in Mexico at the time of his removal adopting the methodology of  Seaman v. [read post]