Search for: "United States v. Wiggins" Results 61 - 80 of 94
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
Belatedly, we report on a recent seminar held at the insurer Hiscox, on the future of press regulation with 5RB’s Matthew Nicklin and Wiggin’s Caroline Kean. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 10:42 pm by Russell Jackson
  Indeed, the fact that the individual unit that the plaintiff owned may no longer be available is irrelevant; the plans and other units of the product are available from which the plaintiff -- usually through expert testimony -- can make her case. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 8:25 am by Bexis
  Put those two together, and that’s why the Pennsylvania Superior Court’s recent decision in Wiggins v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 4:30 am
 The defendants filed their second notice of removal, and the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation transferred the case to the District of Maine for inclusion in MDL No 268. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:30 am by Greg Mersol
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 603 F.3d 571 (9th Cir.), cert. granted, 131 S.Ct. 795 (2010), now pending before the United States Supreme Court, discrimination cases still are being brought and may, under the proper circumstances, be certified. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm by Bexis
Supp.2d 272, 292-93 (S.D.N.Y. 2001) (applying Alabama law); Wiggins v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 7:59 am by Steve Hall
Brennan, Jr. of the United States Supreme Court and to the Hon. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 4:31 am by INFORRM
In Sands v The State of South Australia ([2010] SASC 340) the Supreme Court considered an application for a stay on the grounds of public interest immunity in an action for libel and misfeasance arising out of statements made in the course of a murder investigation. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 7:39 pm by cdw
Accordingly, the holding of the Supreme Court of Ohio was contrary to clearly established federal law as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States in Beck v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 4:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
NY has an internet fraud unit, and Florida has a cybercrime subunit. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:57 am
Citing the Court of Appeals ruling in Wiggins v Board of Education, 60 NY2d 385, the Appellate Division said that because there was no written designation appointing the hearing officer, the appointing authority “lacked jurisdiction” to maintain the initial disciplinary proceeding against Perez. [read post]