Search for: "United States v. Atlantic Commission Co."
Results 61 - 80
of 98
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
For instance, “In-Feed Units” (i.e., “Sponsored By” posts on Facebook) and “Promoted Listings” (i.e., Etsy webpage ads) contain the familiar elements of a print or banner ad: (1) a description of a product, (2) the product manufacturer’s name, and (3) some solicitation to purchase the product or some promotion of the product or brand. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm
Int'l Paper Co., 875 F.2d 468, 473 (5th Cir. 1989)). [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm
Int'l Paper Co., 875 F.2d 468, 473 (5th Cir. 1989)). [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
Civil WarKalyani Ramnath, Harvard University (kalyaniramnath@fas.harvard.edu) Boats in a Storm: Law and Displacement in Postwar South AsiaEvan Taparata, University of Pennsylvania (taparata@sas.upenn.edu) State of Refuge: Refugee Law and the Modern United StatesAdnan Zulfiqar, Rutgers Law School (adnan.zulfiqar@rutgers.edu) Collective Duties in Islamic Law: The Moral Community, State Authority, and Ethical Speculation in the late 9th to the 14th Centuries… [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 7:00 pm
(Patent Prospector) US-Korea adopt patent prosecution highway (Law360) (Patent Docs) (Managing Intellectual Property) Global Global - General Obama, patent reform, patent litigation in the USA and Europe – IP Think Tank podcast 26 January 2009 (IP Think Tank) Intangible values collapse – the old 70% to 80% claim is now officially dead and buried (IAM) (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Managing value in a shrinking economy: the IP audit (IP Frontline) Downturn… [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 4:11 pm
Slip Op. at 2 (quoting Matson Navigation Co. v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:00 am
Goldman & Co., L.P. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
China considered sold ‘within the United States’ for infringement purposes: SEB S.A. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:51 am
Jan. 20, 2009)(Unpub)Affirming dismissal of Black male's age and race/failure-to-promote + retal + HWE claims5th Circuit* Barnett v The Boeing Co., No. 08-20232. (5th Cir. [read post]
26 Nov 2024, 11:23 am
The Ocean Wind 1 and 2 project cancellations also followed the filing of County of Cape May v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
11 May 2012, 5:49 pm
That distinguishes us from the United States, United Kingdom, Canada and New Zealand which all have constitutional or rights charter requirements that proposed laws must be considered for their potential impact on free expression. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 7:06 am
Most notably, he served for more than a year as lead technology consultant to the major tobacco companies in United States of America v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 6:53 am
If ever there were justification for intrusive judicial review of constitutional provisions that protect “discrete and insular minorities,” United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 7:03 am
The Pennsylvania cerebral palsy resource guide was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v… [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
Harris), state or federal court (see his dissent in Michigan v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 3:10 am
” In the United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual, the Sentencing Commission’s Recommendations include a recommendation that the judge review the PSR before agreeing to accept the plea agreement. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee: Balsam Coffee Solutions Inc… [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am
United States v. [read post]
