Search for: "United States v. Bureau of Revenue"
Results 61 - 80
of 221
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2019, 4:52 am
United States (Class Action Settlement Agreement)Peggy Fontenot v. [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 5:03 pm
Without reaching trial or a verdict, the Dominion Voting Systems v. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 8:41 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 7:22 am
Biegalski (Doctrine of Claim Preclusion; State Taxation; Utilities)Guardado v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 2:31 pm
Director of Virgin Islands Bureau of Internal Revenue, Judge Hardiman’s opinion for the Court held that prior to 2004, taxpayers could establish “bona fide residence” regardless of whether their intent was to avoid tax liability or not. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 5:45 am
Overview of Taxes on Tangible Personal Property In the United States, levies on personal property emerged in tandem with taxes on real property. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 3:44 pm
It appears that Cuba remains a special case, one where the economic interests of the United States may play a secondary role--or better put in today's terms, one in which the "better deal" produces a marketplace in the the United States is willing to barter economics for politic objectives. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 3:50 am
Compared to the rest of the world, the United States does not have a unique problem with tax evasion. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 3:16 am
OF REVENUE, ET AL.06-1431 CBOCS WEST, INC. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
Pix credit here In a 53 page opinion, the United States District Court for Northern Alabama has ruled, in National Small Business Association v. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 3:06 pm
” In Community Financial Services v. [read post]
7 May 2006, 9:37 am
In a recent case, two homeowners immigrated from Switzerland and resided legally in the United States. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 5:18 pm
Just as, in McGirt v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 2:23 pm
Sponsoring employers and administrators of cafeteria plans now have additional guidance from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) about when same-sex couples can be treated as spouses for purposes of Internal Revenue Code (Code) Section 125’s rules on cafeteria plans, including health and dependent care flexible spending arrangements (FSAs), and Code Section 223’s rules about health savings accounts (HSAs) following the Supreme Court decision declaring unconstitutional… [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 12:01 pm
In Turner v. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 7:53 am
Judicial NoticeDefendants request that the Court take judicial notice of documents that were filed in various collection lawsuits filed in King County Superior Court and in litigation in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 11:31 am
v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 10:39 am
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/12/10/08-10436.pdf United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 10:49 am
United States Issue: Does United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 7:57 am
United States, 295 U.S. 602 (1935), and Morrison v. [read post]
