Search for: "United States v. City and County of San Francisco"
Results 61 - 80
of 342
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2014, 1:55 pm
City and County of San Francisco, et al. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 4:35 am
City & County of San Francisco, 2010 U.S. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 8:24 am
United States, 403 U.S. 713, this Court upheld the press’ right to publish information of great public concern obtained from documents stolen by a third party. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 8:56 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 12:26 am
Additional Resources: California Assembly passes gig work bill, limiting contractor status, May 29, 2019, By Carolyn Said, The San Francisco Chronicle [read post]
23 May 2022, 10:16 am
On May 12, 2022, the First District Court of Appeal filed a 108-page published opinion affirming a judgment denying a CEQA writ petition that challenged Marin County’s approval of a 43-lot single-family residential subdivision on a 110-acre parcel atop a mountain overlooking the Town of Tiburon and San Francisco Bay. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 11:12 am
In County of San Mateo et al. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:38 am
On September 18, 2014, the City and County of San Francisco and the San Francisco Police Department (“SFPD”) petitioned the California Supreme Court for review. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 4:14 pm
City and County of San Francisco, et al. (1st Dist., Div. 3, 5/31/13) ____ Cal.App.4th ____, 2013 WL 3209381.) [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 6:33 am
City and County of San Francisco, it ordered The City to repay only the increased differential that The City had overcharged Macy's. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 10:21 am
The City and County of San Francisco (“City”) and the community have been formulating plans for the reuse of the former naval station since its closure. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 7:12 pm
City and County of San Francisco, 596 U. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
City and County of San Francisco, 545 U.S. 323 (2005), which held that a state court’s resolution of a claim for just compensation under state law generally has preclusive effect in any subsequent federal suit. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 11:06 am
City and County of San Francisco) addressed San Francisco’s rent control ordinance. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 11:06 am
City and County of San Francisco) addressed San Francisco’s rent control ordinance. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
County of San Bernardino (2016) 247 Cal.App.4th 352. [read post]
14 May 2015, 2:15 pm
Kim, that under United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:28 am
San Francisco. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:03 pm
City and County of San Francisco (2002) 27 Cal.4th 643, 663-671; Santa Monica Beach, Ltd. v. [read post]
30 May 2010, 3:55 pm
County of San Francisco, Triple S. [read post]
