Search for: "United States v. Doles" Results 61 - 80 of 247
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2012, 5:50 am by JB
Here are the questions I've put together for teaching The Health Care Cases, NFIB v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 8:10 am by Stefanie Levine
-Subject to the limitations under paragraph (2), if the issue of an original patent is delayed due to the failure of the United States Patent and Trademark Office to issue a patent within 3 years after the actual filing date of the application in the United States… the term of the patent shall be extended 1 day for each day after the end of that 3-year period until the patent is issued. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 8:10 am by Stefanie Levine
-Subject to the limitations under paragraph (2), if the issue of an original patent is delayed due to the failure of the United States Patent and Trademark Office to issue a patent within 3 years after the actual filing date of the application in the United States… the term of the patent shall be extended 1 day for each day after the end of that 3-year period until the patent is issued. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 10:35 am
This morning the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals released an opinion in Al-Haramain Islamic v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 6:26 am by Kiran Bhat
Greenhouse also names Brown v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 6:30 am by Jane Chong
” This point is key and hasn’t been highlighted enough in the meandering discussions floating around online on everything from Dole to Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 7:28 pm
She was directly admitted to the medical/respiratory intensive care unit (MRICU). [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 6:05 pm
"The United States argued that this provision operates to displace the basic principle that an inventor owns the rights to his invention. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 4:26 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
United States and the Tenth Amendment. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 7:05 am by Antitrust Today
United States Potato Growers of Idaho Inc., et al., No. 10-CV-307-BLW) and the Northern District of California (Marvilla v. [read post]
24 May 2020, 5:34 am by Nicholas Mosvick
It argued the tax was not an excise, it was not uniform throughout the United States, its exceptions were numerous and arbitrary in violation of the Fifth Amendment. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:13 am by Lyle Denniston
  The Court denied review in a major sequel to its campaign finance ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 12:10 pm by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: In New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]