Search for: "United States v. MacDonald" Results 61 - 80 of 134
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2020, 8:43 am by Brett Raffish
§ 1983, provides: Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State ... subjects ... any citizen of the United States ... to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law[.] [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
Surgidev Corp., 899 P.2d 576, 591 (N.M. 1995) (“evidence of compliance with FDA regulations was properly submitted to the jury for consideration”); United Blood Services v. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 3:37 pm
 Katfriends Morag MacDonald (Bird & Bird, left), Richard Vary (Nokia), Sally Field (Bristows) and the eponymous Mehmet Gün are there too, not to mention EPLAW Honorary President Pierre Véron, Margot Fröhlinger (all the way from Eponia), knowledgeable Kevin Mooney (Simmons & Simmons), the dashing Justin Turner QC and, well, you can see for yourself who else is there ... [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Sean Vanderfluit
The test is set out in RJR — MacDonald Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:12 am by New Books Script
Aiyer’s judicial dictionary : a complete law lexicon Nagpur : LexisNexis Butterworths Wadhwa, 2011 2 v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 12:02 pm
United States, 996 F.2d 1121, 1125 n.3 (11th Cir. 1993); Crimm v. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 9:17 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
The Corporations carry on business internationally and have affiliated offices throughout southern Ontario and the United States. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 12:29 pm
The '564 Patent '564 Patent - meet your nemesis Claim 1 of the '564 patent entitled "Insecticidal combination effective against fleas on mammals, particularly cats and dogs" claimed the following A composition which provides small mammals with long-lasting protection against fleas, which includes, on the one hand, [fipronil] and, on the other hand, at least one ovicidal compound (B), of insect growth regulator (IGR) type, in a fluid vehicle which is acceptable to the mammal and suitable… [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 2:24 pm by Eugene Volokh
Hamilton (10th Cir. 1995) (upholding a Kansas criminal defamation statute as facially valid after interpreting it to require actual malice); see generally United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
The Federal Court looked to jurisprudence from the United Kingdom, Cartier International AG v. [read post]