Search for: "United States v. Patch" Results 61 - 80 of 283
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2014, 10:37 am by Katherine McCoy
Environmental Protection Agency, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated EPA’s policy limiting the reach of the Sixth Circuit’s decision in Summit Petroleum Corp. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 10:00 pm
Sec. 337(a), only the United States can enforce the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 1:11 pm by Dave Maass
A thriving market has emerged for these zero days; in some cases governments—including the United States—will purchase these vulnerabilities, which they can use to gain access to targets' computers. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 4:18 pm by David Rossmiller
  In the United States, how innocent co-insureds are treated varies. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 9:35 am
In a decision rereleased as precedential yesterday, the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court’s denial of a preliminary injunction seeking to compel the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office to grant a request for an interim patent term extension under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 6:41 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
When it comes to providing care to mesothelioma patients and protecting consumers from the risks of asbestos exposure, the United States lags significantly behind effort in the United Kingdom. [read post]
Aveva Drug Delivery Systems, Inc., Apotex Corp., and Apotex Inc., the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida recently granted defendant Apotex, Inc. [read post]
Aveva Drug Delivery Systems, Inc., Apotex Corp., and Apotex Inc., the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida recently granted defendant Apotex, Inc. [read post]
Aveva Drug Delivery Systems, Inc., Apotex Corp., and Apotex Inc., the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida recently granted defendant Apotex, Inc. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 12:49 pm by Gene Quinn
This enforcement action by the FTC comes thanks to a June 2013 ruling from the United States Supreme Court in FTC v. [read post]
6 Sep 2014, 8:51 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Fort Worth insurance attorneys who handle hail damage claims need to ready this recent opinion out of the United States District Court, Dallas Division. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 6:54 am
 There is no evidence that the Ortho Evra® patches which [plaintiff] received differed from either the manufacturing specifications for that product or from other identical units. [read post]
15 May 2017, 12:12 pm by Matthew Kahn
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit heard oral argument today in Hawaii v. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by INFORRM
While Justice Thomas has cast some doubt on this form of analysis in his opinion in Reed v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 2:09 am by INFORRM
The United States Government Accountability Office published a report in August 2018 examining the nature of the breach and follow-up work. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 7:49 am
Hurley of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida recently denied motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial by the manufacturer and distributor of the Duragesic pain patch. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
Jackson Lecturer on the Supreme Court of the United States at the Chautauqua Institution. [read post]