Search for: "United States v. Rash"
Results 61 - 80
of 119
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2015, 1:16 pm
So, although the case came out correctly in the end, it took a review by the United States Supreme Court to get it right. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 11:14 am
Therefore, the well is a facility "from which oil or a hazardous substance was discharged""into or upon the navigable waters of the United States. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 5:30 pm
If the recent rash of judicial and administrative decisions involving deference are any indication, successful taxpayer challenges to state tax agency interpretations may be on the rise. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 2:59 am
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that more than 76 million incidents of foodborne illness occur in the United States each year. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
Scobie stated that he had not included the names to comply with libel laws and asserted that the allegations had been printed in error. [read post]
22 May 2015, 4:34 pm
Defendant points to the fact United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) performed a study five years ago that found none of the cosmetics products they tested contained any evidence of asbestos. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 1:15 pm
Specifically, in 2012, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Miller v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 7:48 am
Citing its recent opinions in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:54 am
On the other hand, it would also seem rash to tie States to specific legislative models when these may soon be surpassed, or depend on accompanying measures to guarantee their impact. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 7:27 pm
United States, 2010 U.S. [read post]
25 Aug 2018, 6:33 am
In Chanel S. de R.L. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2018, 6:33 am
In Chanel S. de R.L. v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 8:19 am
Secret Offers to Sell: The Federal Circuit is not slowing down its patent jurisprudence in any way – except for the rash of R.36 affirmances. [read post]
8 May 2011, 10:55 pm
One fascinating point the report unearths is how long the quality of judges issue has been on the UK agenda, and how closely it has been intertwined with unpopular rulings: Following the “Death on the Rock” [McCann v United Kingdom] judgment in 1996,11 the UK Conservative Government proposed recommendations to improve the quality of European Court judges. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 6:34 am
§ 332 states, “Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States, make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, he may … use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress the rebellion” (emphasis added). [read post]
27 Dec 2024, 5:24 am
Monday in Fly v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Md. 2012) (same); New York State Pesticide Coalition, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm
United States, 14-150; potential blockbuster Friedrichs v. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 12:42 pm
That applies as much in Marxist Leninist states (to which the essay is directed) as it does in theocratic states (the clerical elite) and Western states (the socio-economic-political elites). [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 10:11 am
It is too rash, too unadvised, too sudden, too like the lightning, this modern electronic media, which doth cease to be ere one can say, “Just [redacted] Google It,” or so petitioners argue in Authors Guild v. [read post]
