Search for: "United States v. Smart"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,132
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2010, 2:24 pm
Money but not by SCOTUS, see United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 10:28 am
That's why I think the State was smart to note that each individual false statement, standing alone, could've secured the total monetary amount. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 1:46 pm
That' s not going to happen now.The Second Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 8:30 am
In January 2012, the United States Supreme Court issued a ruling in United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 5:47 am
United States v. [read post]
Sixth Circuit Upholds Exclusion of “Fatwa on Your Head? … Leaving Islam?” Ad From Detroit Area Buses
25 Oct 2012, 1:00 pm
See Board of Airport Comm’rs v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 9:44 am
These were apparently lump sum licenses, but included “whereas” clauses stating that EcoFactor believed that the lump-sum payments were based upon this $X per-unit royalty rate. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 11:05 am
As of today, a federal judge and the President of the United States support the result in Texas v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 12:58 pm
My starting disposition is to really not want parents to "kidnap" their kids from other countries and bring them back to the United States. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 7:51 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 10:44 am
The Stolen Valor case, United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 12:57 am
You can find the two court filings below.United States et al. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 7:21 pm
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 3:21 am
[Section 2(d) refusals to register the mark ECLIPSE for various goods relating to motion pictures and entertainment, in classes 9, 14, 18, 24, and 25, in view of, respectively, several class 9 registrations for the identical mark, a registration of the identical mark for watches in class 14, three registration in class 18 for ECLIPSE, ECLIPZE, and ECLIPS & Design, a class 24 registration of ECLIPSE for curtains, and a class 25 registration of the identical mark for footwear].February 17, 2016 -… [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 9:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 6:38 am
Miller, 425 U.S. 435 (1976), and United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 3:56 pm
This type of per se exception to the warrant requirement was rejected by the United States Supreme Court in Missouri v. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 8:54 pm
Judge Rodney Gilstrap of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas scheduled an Ericsson v. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 8:47 am
United States: When the United States Supreme Court quotes you in upholding privacy, that’s a big win. [read post]
