Search for: "United States v. Yang"
Results 61 - 80
of 172
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2023, 11:47 am
On June 16, the Supreme Court issued an 8-1 ruling in United States, ex rel. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 3:30 am
Jenny Yang will run OFCCP. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 9:06 pm
United States, Steven L. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 8:39 am
In a cross-border shooting case, Hernandez et al. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 7:54 am
Do you remember Zarda v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 2:07 pm
Katyal did not have a clear answer to this question – although Assistant to the Solicitor General Anthony Yang (arguing in support of ONEOK on behalf of the United States) later on maintained that federal antitrust remedies would remain available even if the Court finds field preemption. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:15 am
Yang argued for the United States as amicus in support of Missouri. [read post]
28 Sep 2013, 11:08 am
First, the district saw through the argument that the claimed benzene-APL LNT model was good science because the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) relies upon it. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 1:17 am
Recently, the decisions of courts in the United Kingdom (UK) in Unwired Planet v Huawei Technologies (Unwired Planet) and Optis Cellular Technology v Apple (which followed the decision of the UK Supreme Court in Unwired Planet) have given rise to significant debate over the appropriate forum for litigation of disputes in relation to standard essential patents (SEPs). [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 12:00 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 1:10 pm
United States. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 9:48 am
Assistant Solicitor General Anthony Yang was present arguing on behalf of the United States in support of Perez. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:56 pm
§ 2000d et. seq., prohibit LMSD’s race related redistricting actions even though the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution may not.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (3d Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief of Pacific Legal FoundationReply of petitioners (forthcoming) Yang v. [read post]
12 Sep 2020, 8:55 am
” Thus, like Yang v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 9:00 am
The Supreme Court granted certiorari in Vasquez v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 9:13 pm
If Westlaw is to be believed, Ed’s first argument was in United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 7:01 am
H Unit Five, Inc., 2017 WL 4271433 (D. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 8:02 pm
Petition for Certiorari The FCC and the United States filed a petition for review in the Supreme Court last April. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 12:11 am
United States U.S. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 11:25 am
The United States argues that the defendant was the true addressee; hence, why isn't that binding on the government, as an admission that the defendant does have standing? [read post]
