Search for: "Vest v. Superior Court"
Results 61 - 80
of 323
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2009, 8:46 am
The Supreme Court has defined this term (Buckley v. [read post]
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Vincent de Fontbrune v. Alan Wofsy, Docket No. 19-16913
5 Oct 2022, 3:00 am
To be sure, a party must show the “irreducible constitutional minimum of standing” to vest an Article III federal court with subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 5:29 am
Superior Court, 140 Cal.App.4thh 1238, 1249 (Cal.App. 2006)). [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 5:31 pm
In Coral Lakes Community Association, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 2:41 pm
The superior court ruled that the prosecution power is vested in the Board and not in OPR. [read post]
27 May 2009, 3:18 pm
Based on its extensive analysis of the provisions of a development agreement and the municipal code, the court reversed the Superior Court on the impact fees issue. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 12:26 pm
Plaintiff then sought a review of the Office’s decision in the Superior Court for the District of Columbia (the “Court”). [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 1:03 pm
As such, the court found that the Superior Court was faced with an interpretive dispute and not a res judicata question. [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:42 am
The Superior Court of Yolo County (2013) 214 Cal.App.4th 1233. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 1:12 pm
Yesterday, I discussed the employment contract portion of a new Appellate Court case, Ziotas v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 4:00 pm
Supreme Court decided Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 12:54 pm
Westrick v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 8:01 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 8:01 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 6:01 pm
App. 453, 574 S.E.2d 595 (2002), the Court made it clear that the Superior Court has the equity power to strip claims from the wrongdoer and to preserve the right of recovery at the same time. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 10:34 am
Last week, in City of San Jose v. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 5:19 pm
The court’s ruling essentially invalidates SWRCB’s nearly two-decade-long effort to fill the gap left by the shrinking scope of regulation under the federal Clean Water Act following the Supreme Court’s 2001 decision in Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook Cty. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 9:50 am
The court held that even if in insolvent LLCs no stockholders will enforce fiduciary duties, the General Assembly is vested with the power to make the policy choice, and the courts must honor that choice. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 4:23 pm
Superior Court (1960) 54 Cal.2d 548, 564.) [read post]
4 Aug 2018, 2:12 pm
The court rejected this contention, and found that the Superior Court was vested with the subject matter jurisdiction to order McLaughlin to remove the garage pursuant to statute, and McLaughlin admitted he received notice of the April 7, 2014 hearing. [read post]
