Search for: "WRIGHT v. FLORIDA"
Results 61 - 80
of 220
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm
If Ranked-Choice Voting had been used to reallocate Nader’s votes in 2000, Al Gore would certainly have won Florida (where Nader got almost 100,000 votes, much, much larger than the Bush margin of victory there), and may also have won New Hampshire, where Nader collected over 22,000 votes and Bush apparently won by under 8,000.Either one of these states would have given Gore an electoral college win. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 6:05 am
Wright v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 5:04 am
The story of Ingraham v. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 10:05 am
In Wright v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 11:07 am
In Roth Brothers of Florida v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 11:07 am
In Roth Brothers of Florida v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
One of the most contentious cases of the Supreme Court’s term has been Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 1:50 pm
Border Searches of Electronic Devices The law is clear: the Supreme Court in 1977 in United States v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 8:12 am
Wright ed. 1961) (A. [read post]
18 May 2018, 2:38 pm
Wright v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:02 am
Last up is Wright v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 1:42 pm
Wright (which is underway in a West Palm Beach, Florida, federal court) makes a bombshell claim. [read post]
10 May 2018, 11:27 am
Air Force living in Florida. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 1:22 pm
Azar v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 2:09 pm
United States; and (2) whether reasonable jurists can debate whether Florida attempted first-degree murd [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 8:11 am
United States, 17-6829, Wright v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
Notably, there was no suggestion that any unequal treatment of votes under Florida’s process was invidious.I am far from convinced that Bush v. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 1:38 pm
Air Force living in Florida. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 5:55 pm
Wright v marshaw from mzamoralaw Key sentence: "Regarding the social media records, petitioner has not demonstrated a “link” or shown that he is being asked to furnish or reveal anything that he did not already publically post. [read post]
