Search for: "Wales v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 755
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2019, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
The Michaelmas Legal Term in England and Wales began a week ago, on Tuesday 1 October 2019. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
United States Surgical Corporation (1984) Simone Degeling and Greg Weeks13. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
Informational privacy law England and Wales In England and Wales the tort of misuse of private information requires an individual establish a reasonable expectation of privacy (REP) over the relevant information. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
The State courts and legislatures The first is the decision of the United States Supreme Court in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:56 am
” The Government of the United Kingdom identified the emblem as “[t]he official emblem of the Prince of Wales” when it notified WIPO in 2005, under the Paris Convention, that this emblem is a ‘state emblem’ of the United Kingdom. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 9:05 am by Florian Mueller
The next court to look at this will presumably the United States District for the Southern District of Florida at next year's Motorola v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 10:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
  As each workshop approaches, we will send an email to those on our list with details concerning location and/or accessibility via Zoom.Oct. 19, 2021: Mark Krass, Stanford Law and Political ScienceDebunking the Non-Delegation Doctrine for State Regulation of Federal ElectionsNov. 2, 2021: Margarita Lila Rosa, Lecturer and Mellon Postdoctoral Fellow, Stanford Marginalia: Black Women and Emerging Carceral Geographies in Rio de Janeiro, 1880-1888Nov. 16, 2021: Sara Forsdyke,… [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 5:30 pm by INFORRM
In dismissing the application in DHR International, Inc a company incorporated in Delaware in the United States of America v Challis [2015] NSWSC 1567, White J found that the plaintiff failed to show that the statements in the blog were false, ‘or at least materially false’ – a key element of the tort of injurious falsehood. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Section 9 provides that: The section applies to an action for defamation against a person who is not domiciled (a) in the United Kingdom; (b) in another Member State; or (c) in a state which is for the time being a contracting party to the Lugano Convention. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 5:11 am by Florian Mueller
Gilstrap of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas affirmed that decision last month. [read post]
14 May 2009, 8:46 am
The ACLU should be sanctioned for its frivolous lawsuit challenging gene patents, which was filed Tuesday in the United States Federal District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]