Search for: "Wales v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 700
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2014, 1:57 pm
Image courtesy of Flickr and State Library of New South Wales. [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:55 am
HRH Prince of Wales v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:56 am
” The Government of the United Kingdom identified the emblem as “[t]he official emblem of the Prince of Wales” when it notified WIPO in 2005, under the Paris Convention, that this emblem is a ‘state emblem’ of the United Kingdom. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 9:05 am
The next court to look at this will presumably the United States District for the Southern District of Florida at next year's Motorola v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 10:30 pm
As each workshop approaches, we will send an email to those on our list with details concerning location and/or accessibility via Zoom.Oct. 19, 2021: Mark Krass, Stanford Law and Political ScienceDebunking the Non-Delegation Doctrine for State Regulation of Federal ElectionsNov. 2, 2021: Margarita Lila Rosa, Lecturer and Mellon Postdoctoral Fellow, Stanford Marginalia: Black Women and Emerging Carceral Geographies in Rio de Janeiro, 1880-1888Nov. 16, 2021: Sara Forsdyke,… [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
GSS Group v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm
Section 9 provides that: The section applies to an action for defamation against a person who is not domiciled (a) in the United Kingdom; (b) in another Member State; or (c) in a state which is for the time being a contracting party to the Lugano Convention. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 5:30 pm
In dismissing the application in DHR International, Inc a company incorporated in Delaware in the United States of America v Challis [2015] NSWSC 1567, White J found that the plaintiff failed to show that the statements in the blog were false, ‘or at least materially false’ – a key element of the tort of injurious falsehood. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 5:11 am
Gilstrap of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas affirmed that decision last month. [read post]
14 May 2009, 8:46 am
The ACLU should be sanctioned for its frivolous lawsuit challenging gene patents, which was filed Tuesday in the United States Federal District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 1:57 am
Note that the order in which I just stated the parties is Appellant v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 5:29 pm
Secondly, there is a point concerning the position in the United States. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 1:58 pm
In an earlier post, I looked at a recent judgment of the England and Wales High Court by Justice Munby in Hashem v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
The agreement “stated that it was governed by Belize law.” In 2008, the United Democratic Party took power on a good government platform, and the new prime minister, Dean Barrow, asserted that the contract was invalid and repudiated it. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 3:43 am
In this post, Ross Ludlow, Legal Support Assistant at Matrix Chambers, comments on the case of R v Maughan (Northern Ireland) [2022] UKSC 13. [read post]
24 Jul 2022, 12:05 am
Its Terms of Reference state: “There is a solemn duty on our whole United Kingdom to come together and mark this momentous and life-changing occurrence. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:22 am
’s] residence to the United States. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 1:02 am
Yesterday the Court of Appeal for England and Wales (Lords Justices Rix, Lloyd and Wilson) gave its ruling in Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd, [2009] EWCA Civ 753.At issue in this dispute was the shape of Whirlpool's retro-looking KitchenAid Artisan mixer and its rival, Kenwood's kMix. [read post]
24 May 2011, 1:46 pm
Strong AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
Secretary of State and J v. [read post]
