Search for: "Wells v. Lloyd" Results 61 - 80 of 577
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2019, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
The claimant in Lloyd v Google sought damages on behalf of a class of more than 4 million iPhone users affected by Google’s acquisition and use of information generated by their Safari browsers. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:48 am by Dave
  And the land registration machinery is precisely in point because the buyer must be entitled to rely on that machinery in the Act, otherwise there would be chaos (well, for property lawyers at least); further the purpose of the standard condition is to protect the seller against possible claims by the buyer, not the imposition of a new personal obligation on the buyer ([62]).Now, I have to admit that I buy into Lloyd LJ’s reasoning. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:48 am by Dave
  And the land registration machinery is precisely in point because the buyer must be entitled to rely on that machinery in the Act, otherwise there would be chaos (well, for property lawyers at least); further the purpose of the standard condition is to protect the seller against possible claims by the buyer, not the imposition of a new personal obligation on the buyer ([62]).Now, I have to admit that I buy into Lloyd LJ’s reasoning. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
Events 11KBW’s Anya Proops QC, Christopher Knight and Rupert Paines will be conducting a webinar on the Lloyd v Google judgement on 16 November 2021 at 17:00. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 2:56 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In the previous post, we had detailed the facts in the Enercon v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 4:33 am
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London, et al., No. 09 945, a case under consideration for certiorari by the U.S. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 7:00 am by INFORRM
In the case of Traveller Movement v Ofcom ([2015] EWHC 406 (Admin)) one of the nation’s great televisual fascinations became the unlikely subject of an Administrative Court judgment that demonstrates the limits of common law standards of fairness, as well as the lightness of touch applied by the courts when reviewing the decision-making of the media regulator. [read post]
2 Apr 2016, 8:50 am by Patrick McGinnis
The Hamilton court fairly well ignored this evidence, which should have been dispositive. [read post]