Search for: "White Motor Co. v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 98
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
– battle between designer ‘Hidden Eloise’ and Paperchase (Class 99) United States US General Should USA black list itself on its Special 301 List? [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
– battle between designer ‘Hidden Eloise’ and Paperchase (Class 99) United States US General Should USA black list itself on its Special 301 List? [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Ford Motor Co., No. 08-1082 (6th Cir. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am
The underpinning of Daubert is that an expert’s opinion could be unreliable and the jury could not figure that out, even given cross-examination and argument, because the jurors are deferent to a qualified expert (i.e., the white lab coat effect). [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 12:00 am
[13] As a result, a court award can be substantial:Former television game show personality Vanna White was awarded $403,000 after Samsung depicted her as a robot in their VCR television advertisements. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 11:02 am
[13] As a result, a court award can be substantial:Former television game show personality Vanna White was awarded $403,000 after Samsung depicted her as a robot in their VCR television advertisements. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
Claiborne Hardware Co. [read post]
29 May 2007, 1:14 pm
United Shoe Machinery Corp., 392 U. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 11:48 pm
While the petition does not specifically lay out what portions of the relevant statutes and United States Constitution the FCC violated, Verizon is clearly invoking the APA's arbitrary and capricious test. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Jan. 26, 2009)Affirming dismissal of White cop's race/failure-to-promote suit>> Noted here: SJ-R.com>> EEOC v Watkins Motor Lines, No. 08-2483 (7th Cir. [read post]
1 May 2009, 3:48 am
Motors Corp., No. 08-1113ADASee issue description at Public CitizenØ SCOTUS docket hereAdam v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 3:27 am
United Parcel Service, No. 08-60448 (5th Cir. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
That point was made clear by the Supreme Court just two months ago when, in the case of Matal v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 12:45 am
The head of the Manhattan DA's elder abuse unit said Marshall and lawyer Francis X. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am
With free legal aid from National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Geary filed a federal complaint arguing the union infringed on her constitutionally protected rights under the foundation-won CWA v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited: (Out-Law), (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:Forbes interview with M Meurer (co author of ‘Patent Failure’): (Patent Prospector), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IAM), (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property), (Patent Prospector),Rambus – Rambus stock soars following jury’s dismissal of antitrust and fraud charges from Hynix, Micron, and Nanya… [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:38 pm
The Court, in Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, a person shall be strictly liable for a violation of this subsection upon proof of a violation of subsection b. of N.J.S.2C:29-2 or while operating a motor vehicle in violation of subsection c. of N.J.S.2C:20-10 which resulted in bodily injury to another person; or (7) Attempts to cause significant bodily injury to another or causes significant bodily injury purposely or knowingly or, under circumstances manifesting extreme… [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
" No, said the California Supreme Court: [W]e are not persuaded that imposing a duty on landlords to withhold rental units from those they believe to be gang members is a fair or workable solution to [the] problem [of gang violence], or one consistent with our state's public policy as a whole. [read post]
