Search for: "Zarda v. Altitude Express, Inc." Results 61 - 80 of 133
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2019, 9:33 am by Amy Howe
Altitude Express and Clayton County push back, arguing that a ruling for Bostock and Zarda would “rewrite” Title VII. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 8:23 am by Kalvis Golde
Clayton County, Georgia and Altitude Express Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 7:55 am by The Boyd Law Group, PLLC
Altitude Express, Inc., sexual orientation discrimination is considered to be a subset of gender discrimination under Title VII. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Presumably, in 2020, the Court will decide this case and two other related cases:  Altitude Express v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 10:57 am by Brett Holubeck
Some of the issues at play are: whether Title VII prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation (Altitude Express v. [read post]
25 May 2019, 5:43 am by Embajador Microjuris al Día
El Tribunal Supremo acordó escuchar el caso de Nueva York, Altitude Express Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 5:40 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in three cases.First, the Court consolidated Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 8:14 am by Howard Friedman
Clayton County, Georgia, (Docket No. 17-1618) (SCOTUSblog Case Page) and consolidated it with Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]