Search for: "does" Results 61 - 80 of 490,914
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Unlike the others present at an execution, journalists are there to provide us with a detailed account of the things the government does when it kills in our name.Follow @ljstprof Austin Sarat is the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Jurisprudence and Political Science at Amherst College. [read post]
1 Dec 2024, 8:33 pm by Josh Blackman
For what it's worth, this pardon does not prevent Hunter from facing charges in state court. [read post]
1 Dec 2024, 8:30 pm by Anderson Franco Law
However, if the insurance company does not offer a fair amount, the victim might still need to go to court to get the compensation they deserve. [read post]
1 Dec 2024, 7:32 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Via LLRX – Why does the Senate confirm Trump’s picks for key posts — and how? [read post]
1 Dec 2024, 6:19 pm by Francis Pileggi
Boilerplate objections to discovery requests are not truly replies at all–especially when the objection does not make clear what exactly is being withheld and what is being produced. [read post]
1 Dec 2024, 6:18 pm by Kurt R. Karst
  And for foreign companies, FDA does not even need to go through the formality of issuing a Warning Letter to get its way. [read post]
1 Dec 2024, 4:05 pm by Stuart Kaplow
” The Court concluded its opinion with a strong rebuke to the Attorney General for overstepping her authority: “While I can think of no reasonable person who does not believe in the imperatives of recycling and being better stewards of our environment, this does not give rise to phantom assertions of liability that do nothing to solve the problem that exists. [read post]
1 Dec 2024, 3:00 pm by Author
The other parent typically has visitation rights but does not have a say in major decisions. [read post]
1 Dec 2024, 2:04 pm by Patricia Salkin
“Because the [older persons] exemption does not apply and the Ordinance’s restriction on ownership in age-restricted communities discriminates on the basis of familial status, we conclude that the Ordinance violates 42 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Dec 2024, 1:30 pm by Anderson Franco Law
It is important for victims to know that they have options and that they do not have to accept the first offer from an insurance company if it does not seem fair. [read post]
1 Dec 2024, 12:16 pm by Ambrosio Rodriguez
Expungement: While expunging a conviction clears it from public records, it does not erase the immigration consequences. [read post]
1 Dec 2024, 11:00 am by Stacey Matthews
“I want to make sure we have a conversation about, where does the money go, and why don’t we know where it goes? [read post]
1 Dec 2024, 10:33 am
It does so by recovering a lost history of how American jurists conceived that role from the American founding to the close of the nineteenth century. [read post]
1 Dec 2024, 10:33 am by Christine Corcos
It does so by recovering a lost history of how American jurists conceived that role from the American founding to the close of the nineteenth century. [read post]
1 Dec 2024, 9:50 am by Giles Peaker
Although it is necessary for the payment to be required “in consideration of” the grant of a tenancy, that does not necessarily refer to a bargain between the parties that the payment is given in exchange for the tenancy. [read post]
1 Dec 2024, 8:36 am by Frank Yiannas
  In contrast, I think it does more harm to the public, longer term, than it helps, as it communicates that there isn’t really anything to be concerned about or that we should be working with a sense of urgency to prevent them. [read post]
1 Dec 2024, 8:07 am
Interestingly enough, the principles apply as well to rules-enforcing systems as it does to objectives-meeting systems, both of which appear to be reluctant to develop robust quantitative measures in the service of either objectives.based or rule-enforcement-based systems. [read post]
1 Dec 2024, 7:04 am by Kevin LaCroix
Though the complaint notes that Black Rock and State Street publicly withdrew from Climate Action 100+, the withdrawal “does not change the reality that Defendants’ holdings threaten to substantially change competition to substantially reduce competition in violation of Section 7 of the Clayton Act. [read post]