Search for: "A----. B v. C----. D"
Results 781 - 800
of 10,539
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2024, 9:08 am
Use of a trade mark as a trade or company name or part thereof (Art. 10(3)(d) TMD/Art. 9(3)(d) EUTMR) as such has been found not to be trade mark infringing as it does not constitute use ‘in relation to goods or services’ (CJEU, Céline, case C-17/06, IPKat here). [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 3:38 am
He was convicted of stealing $11,000 from his grandmother, based on the fact that (A) he knew where grandma kept the money, and had a key to her house, (B) there was no sign of break-in when the grandmother found money missing, (C) shortly after the money went missing, Ingram opened an account with a deposit of $9,900, despite (D) never having held a job, as best anyone can figure. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
The Seventh Circuit seems to say both "no" and "yes" in Sissom v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
The Seventh Circuit seems to say both "no" and "yes" in Sissom v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
The Seventh Circuit seems to say both "no" and "yes" in Sissom v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 11:10 am
MYERS, M.D., WEST FLORIDA SPECIALTY PHYSICIANS, LLC d/b/a WEST FLORIDA CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY and d/b/a and a/k/a WEST FLORIDA MEDICAL GROUP, and WEST FLORIDA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC. d/b/a WEST FLORIDA HOSPITAL, Appellees. 1st District.Wrongful death -- Nursing homes -- Jury trial -- Denial -- Appeals -- Certiorari -- Order striking request for jury trial based on express waiver in nursing facility residency agreement is not… [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 8:27 am
") AC35133 - Taylor v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 9:30 am
Dist. v Peters, 123 AD3d 1198; Matter of Rochester City School Dist. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 9:30 am
Dist. v Peters, 123 AD3d 1198; Matter of Rochester City School Dist. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
From SSRN:Robert C. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:00 am
(d) EFFECTIVE DATE. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 5:14 am
By K&L Gates D'Onofrio v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 12:36 pm
By: Joseph C. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
M. le juge Vézina, dissident: C’est le droit civil québécois qui s’applique à l’établissement de propriété et à son transfert. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm
The values of the average particle sizes ð, ðv, and ðs differ for any particle size distribution (...). [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 7:35 am
That has real ramifications in what congress does, v. trade secret/TM b/c those rely on Commerce Clause. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 7:47 am
That is, if the list of beneficiaries is A, then B, then C, then outright to D, the court appears to be saying that D is a qualified beneficiary under the above rules because D “would be a distributee. . . on termination of the interests of other distributees [our C]. . . then receiving” if we apply the rules prospectively to the point in time where C would be a current distributee even though C is not presently a… [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
(a) Greig v Stirling & anr (b) Hamaizia & Anor v The Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis (c) Garcia v Associated Newspapers Limited (d) Mionis v Democratic Press SA & Ors (12) Who is the odd one out? [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 8:25 am
(a) Greig v Stirling & anr (b) Hamaizia & Anor v The Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis (c) Garcia v Associated Newspapers Limited (d) Mionis v Democratic Press SA & Ors (12) Who is the odd one out? [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 8:47 am
Forum-shopping from TTAB/federal court; D secured transfer from Mass. to Cal. b/c standard for proving abandonment is not consistent through US. [read post]
