Search for: "Goode v. State"
Results 781 - 800
of 50,175
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2013, 6:38 am
Settlements are good for both parties in that they save time and money. [read post]
30 May 2016, 8:04 am
Perhaps its time for Congress and the State legislatures to review these restrictions, and determine whether they do more harm than good. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 8:59 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 6:30 am
Rev.709 (1994).And indeed In League of Women Voters of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 12:36 pm
On April 29, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 12:37 pm
The Chancery Court then reaffirmed that Brophy remains good law: I must confront their assertion that Brophy is no longer good law. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 10:13 pm
Not a good day for the U.S. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 4:38 am
CLE lecturers consistently warn of the attorney fee-legal malpractice reflex arc, and with good reason. [read post]
24 May 2010, 2:02 pm
Here is a bit more explanation of the odd case of Robertson v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 1:36 pm
And now there's another, State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 3:12 am
His concurrence did not seriously question the majority view that Roe was not based on a good law. [read post]
18 May 2012, 1:21 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 11:36 am
I previously blogged about White v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 4:56 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 9:00 am
In Citizens Development Corporation, Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 11:13 am
Just weeks after the Georgia v. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 8:14 am
State v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 5:53 pm
In State v O’Brien, the defendant attempted to circumvent the one and done rule by reopening his prior (20 yr old) marijuana related CD in the municipal court. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 7:52 am
Cahaly v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 12:51 pm
The lower district court held, that although there was lack of probable cause, a "good faith" exception was made to all the police to proceed with the unlawful search under the "good faith reliance doctrine" (United States v. [read post]
