Search for: "In Re Christine" Results 781 - 800 of 1,101
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2008, 1:40 pm
I do not speak on behalf of Christine Jennings or anybody else involved with the campaign.] [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 1:22 am
"We're here because of the inexact science long ago. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 12:55 pm
We're going to have an antitrust division in the Justice Department that actually believes in antitrust law. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 10:34 am by Elie Mystal
You can’t re-sell your law degree at a huge loss (unless you’re this guy). [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 9:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Q: you’re not necessarily disagreeing about license availability.A: no record showing unwillingness to license to individuals. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:48 am by Dan Ernst
Finally, Jeffrey Sturchio and Louis Galambos sweep over the twentieth century and explore the tensions that existed between businesses and the professions as they defined and re-defined their respective borders. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 9:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Applying Belmora, the court allows the various Lanham Act claims to proceed, and cites Christine Haight Farley’s work in also allowing claims under the Inter-American Convention for Trademark and Commercial Protection (IAC). [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 7:30 am
The Board’s conclusion re-lies at least in part on stereotyped speculation.Since Coca-Cola failed to prove that the reputation of its THUMS UP and LIMCA marks extended to the United States, it did not establish reputational injury in the United States. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 3:32 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
A: Wouldn’t require platforms to sell whatever they’re offered. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 11:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Aligns w/what you’re trying to say: the liberty interest represented by property is dominant, which forces the equalit [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 11:25 am by Joseph Fishkin
” And that was just the start of a long calumny of decades of narrative hardball, from the “high-tech lynching” of Clarence Thomas to the “false” accusations by Christine Blasey Ford (whose name Lee won’t say, since in his telling it was really “the Democrats”) against Brett Kavanaugh.Skipping closer to the present day, the most important single fact about judicial-nominations hardball in the 2000s was the dramatic escalation, primarily by… [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:30 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
But clearly, we're moving in the right direction. [read post]