Search for: "In re I.S."
Results 781 - 800
of 13,322
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2018, 12:00 am
” Because of the difficulty in measuring gluten levels in fermented beverages, only those that are inherently gluten free (i.e., use/contain inherently gluten-free ingredients and are the subject of good manufacturing and storing practices to avoid cross-contamination so that they’re under 20 ppm gluten) can be labeled as gluten-free. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 5:22 pm
As a result of the new partnership audit regime: (1) individuals and/or entities that were formerly owners of General Partnerships, Limited Partnerships and multi-member Limited Liability Companies (together “Partnerships”) during prior, audited tax years may escape liability for unpaid tax, and correspondingly (2) the existing owners of such Partnership (i.e., the owners of the Partnership at the time of the IRS collection process) will bear the economic burden entirely. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 5:16 am
As noted above, the agents and/or prosecutor applying for the warrant argued that this request, while “novel”, falls within the scope of Rule 41, i.e., that the rule allows the court to issue such a warrant. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 11:01 pm
There are serious questions of whether Mexico is becoming that scariest of things, a military state in only partial control -- i.e., a Latin American Pakistan. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 10:32 am
The court noted that CTO Director’s post-employment was a material benefit, without providing any insight into how it made this conclusion aside from citing its opinion in In re Primedia Inc. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Regardless, if you’re a small business owner, it means a great deal of tax planning is needed to protect what you have earned. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 7:00 am
Regardless, if you're a small business owner, it means a great deal of tax planning is needed to protect what you have earned. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 6:49 pm
In In re Ferguson, Applicants submitted a claim directed to a method (i.e., process) of marketing a product. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 2:18 pm
If you’re heading out to IRWA Chapter 57’s Water Supply & Impacts seminar, I look forward to seeing you there. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 1:31 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada will rule this Thursday morning at 9:45 AM whether it will hear an appeal from the Federal Court of Appeal, which confirmed - as most copyright lawyers expected - that Re:Sound (formerly NRCC) has no basis to pursue a tariff for the use of sound recordings in films shown in theatres or on TV.Here's what I said about this case back in February of 2011:Re:Sound Proposed Tariff for Use of Soundtracks in Theatres & TV Nixed (Again) Presumably, very few… [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 5:12 pm
Bair" suggest that it's time to republish, update and provide further underscore to one of my most popular blog posts of last year "Yeah We're Different Alright". [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 11:33 am
They're not supposed to. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 12:00 pm
See In re Sanders, 159 S.W.3d 797, 801 (Tex. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 9:07 am
If we ever re-devise WAC? [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 11:00 am
One question under this provision is whether it only applies to lawsuits filed in bad faith, or whether it also applies to lawsuits that are maintained in bad faith (i.e., lawsuits that continue to be prosecuted – even after it becomes clear that there was no trade secret misappropriation). [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 3:30 am
In this newest volume, she surveys our Constitutional jurisprudence, re-centering our understanding of America’s foundational law in relation to its most fundamental material stakes. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 6:34 am
In other words, to show you're a good advocate, but not necessarily a good scholar. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 8:08 am
See In re Oelrich, 666 F.2d 578, 581 (CCPA 1981). [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 12:01 am
The structure of the book follows an adage I once heard for legal memoranda: (1) tell ‘em what you’re goin’ to tell ‘em; (2) tell ‘em; and (3) tell ‘em what you told ‘em. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 7:55 am
We're in an era of digital angels but we still have analog rules. [read post]
