Search for: "In re I.S." Results 781 - 800 of 13,469
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2010, 3:21 pm by Evan Brown (@internetcases)
In re Anonymous Online Speakers, — F.3d —, 2010 WL 2721490 (9th Cir. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 4:07 pm by Jason
Don’t assume that just because you’re paid a salary you’re exempt from overtime eligibility. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 7:38 am
The major proposals are the expansion of certification programmes â€" i.e. the institutions accredited to do so â€" as well as a potential raising of the bar. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 3:04 am by Broc Romanek
” In other words, you’re either using the same median employee – or one of the alternates – that you identified last year. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 12:00 am by Frank Knizner
” Because of the difficulty in measuring gluten levels in fermented beverages, only those that are inherently gluten free (i.e., use/contain inherently gluten-free ingredients and are the subject of good manufacturing and storing practices to avoid cross-contamination so that they’re under 20 ppm gluten) can be labeled as gluten-free. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 5:16 am by Susan Brenner
As noted above, the agents and/or prosecutor applying for the warrant argued that this request, while “novel”, falls within the scope of Rule 41, i.e., that the rule allows the court to issue such a warrant. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 8:43 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
[Citations to In re LeGrice and In re Donohue omitted.]It is evident that the above-quoted portion of In re Graves constitutes only dicta and thus is not controlling. [read post]
As a result of the new partnership audit regime: (1) individuals and/or entities that were formerly owners of General Partnerships, Limited Partnerships and multi-member Limited Liability Companies (together “Partnerships”) during prior, audited tax years may escape liability for unpaid tax, and correspondingly (2) the existing owners of such Partnership (i.e., the owners of the Partnership at the time of the IRS collection process) will bear the economic burden entirely. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 11:00 am by Peter (Pete) A. Steinmeyer
One question under this provision is whether it only applies to lawsuits filed in bad faith, or whether it also applies to lawsuits that are maintained in bad faith (i.e., lawsuits that continue to be prosecuted – even after it becomes clear that there was no trade secret misappropriation). [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 3:30 am by Christina S. Ho
In this newest volume, she surveys our Constitutional jurisprudence, re-centering our understanding of America’s foundational law in relation to its most fundamental material stakes. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 11:49 am
Of particular interest are businesses deemed to have access to "critical infrastructure" - i.e., military bases, airports. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 3:00 am by Kyle Krull
Regardless, if you’re a small business owner, it means a great deal of tax planning is needed to protect what you have earned. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 6:49 pm
In In re Ferguson, Applicants submitted a claim directed to a method (i.e., process) of marketing a product. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 2:18 pm by Brad Kuhn
If you’re heading out to IRWA Chapter 57’s Water Supply & Impacts seminar, I look forward to seeing you there. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 7:00 am by Idaho Estate Planning
Regardless, if you're a small business owner, it means a great deal of tax planning is needed to protect what you have earned. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 10:32 am by Daniel Bauer
The court noted that CTO Director’s post-employment was a material benefit, without providing any insight into how it made this conclusion aside from citing its opinion in In re Primedia Inc. [read post]