Search for: "Johnson v. People" Results 781 - 800 of 2,720
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm by David Kopel
The co-authors are Nicholas Johnson (Fordham), Michael O’Shea (Oklahoma City), George Mocsary (Connecticut), and me.Below the fold is the full Table of Contents and Preface for the book. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am by Kashmir Hill
“In a market like now, we have lots and lots of people interested in joining the company,” said Jerry Okarma of Johnson Controls, a technology company based in Wisconsin. [read post]
THE
2 Dec 2009, 3:35 pm by CAPTAIN
A high court majority rejected Johnson's application for a stay of execution and his petition for review in which he raised the Eighth Amendment challenge.Justice John Paul Stevens, joined by Justice Stephen Breyer, dissented, saying Johnson’s situation was “as compelling a case” as he had encountered raising the constitutional concerns that Stevens himself raised in a 1995 dissent from another denial of certiorari: Lackey v. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 7:48 pm by Marty Lederman
 (When it later moved the INS from the Department of Justice to DHS, Congress transferred this and other authorities from the Attorney General to the DHS Secretary.)When the Texas v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 6:52 am by Nabiha Syed
This blog also features Kevin Johnson and Jill Family as they preview upcoming immigration law issues in Vartelas v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 11:19 pm
Well, the Radmacher v Granatino case has certainly got family lawyers writing. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 6:11 pm
Most people would consider this sort of hate crime to be a horrific act. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 6:10 pm
Decl. of Dana Johnson (Docket # 22) (Johnson Decl.); Decl. of Craig McLaughlin (Docket # 24) (McLaughlin Decl.) [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 7:25 pm by Michael O'Hear
Johnson and “those people who are locked into sentences who, at this point anyway, cannot get back in front of a court for re-sentencing. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:03 am by Eugene Volokh
Johnson: “If the [Government’s] regulation is not related to expression, then the less stringent standard we announced in United States v. [read post]