Search for: "LIVINGSTON v LIVINGSTON" Results 781 - 800 of 876
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2010, 2:40 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
” • Pia Letto-Vanamo, University of Helsinki, “Some Remarks on the History of Legal Argumentation” • Michael A Livingston, Rutgers School of Law, “One Hatred, Many Laws: The Evolution of Antisemitic Laws in Germany, France, and Italy in Comparative Historical Perspective” • Lara Magnusdottir, University of Iceland, “How to understand a Concordat when you don‘t know what the word means” • Aniceto Masferrer, University of… [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 12:50 am by Ben Reeve-Lewis
But a Shelter article dusted off my legal brain and piqued my interest on an Equalities Act defence to possession proceedings As a result of Akerman-Livingstone (Appellant) v Aster Communities Limited (formerly Flourish Homes Limited) (Respondent) [2015], landlords, both social and private will have to persuade a court that eviction of a disabled tenant will have to be shown to be proportionate and necessary. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 12:26 am
Schwartz, a law professor at Touro College, writes that the decision in Paul v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 11:47 am by Colin Murray
Playing the Nazi card remains a particularly prevalent feature of political punditry in the US (see the Daily Show’s send up of conservative commentator Glenn Beck’s repeated linking of President Obama’s policies with those of Hitler) and even crops up occasionally in UK politics (including Ken Livingstone’s infamous “Nazi concentration camp guard” jibe at a reporter). [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 8:25 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The controlled substances involved included the Schedule II drug OxyContin, the Schedule III drug Vicodin, the Schedule IV drug Xanax, and the Schedule V drug cough syrup with codeine. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 6:23 pm by Kevin
Livingston contended that insects are not fish[.] [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 7:40 am by Joy Waltemath
” The dissent, however, believed that no reasonable jury could find that the agency’s assertion that it didn’t hire her due to her inexperience was pretexual (Walsh v. [read post]