Search for: "State California v. Superior Court"
Results 781 - 800
of 4,010
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2007, 2:00 pm
Superior Court. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 6:00 am
Superior Court (1994) 27 Cal.App.4th 832, 838-839.) [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 1:32 pm
State of California (1983) 139 Cal.App.3d, 556.) [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 6:05 am
But a federal district court does not have jurisdiction to hear a case removed from a state court if the state court did not have jurisdiction to hear it. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 10:23 am
The father appeared and sought an order dismissing the mother's order to show cause upon the ground that the State of New York lacks jurisdiction to determine the custody of the child, noting that an action is presently pending to determine his custody in the Superior Court of California, San Mateo County. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 5:02 pm
Employers Generally Not Required to Ensure Breaks Taken As outlined in the California Supreme Court ruling of Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 8:00 am
The superior court consolidated the actions for all purposes. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 1:50 pm
Drug Company Reports 2,660 Cases In New Jersey State Court Consolidation, 1,075 Cases Are Part Of Federal Court MDL, And 470 In California (Posted by Tom Lamb at DrugInjuryWatch.com)About five months ago we posted "March 2013 Fosamax Product Liability Litigation Update: Femur Fracture Cases Against Merck -- December 31, 2012 Totals: 2,075 New Jersey (NJ) State Court Lawsuits, With 820 Cases Pending In Federal Court Fosamax MDL And 420… [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 5:23 am
Superior Court, No. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 9:35 am
Co., 20 Cal. 2d 199 (1942)) by the California Supreme Court in Hernandez v. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 6:06 pm
Superior Court (Fire Ins. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 6:16 am
The California Supreme Court will soon take up this question in Kuciemba v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 11:47 am
Superior Court can be read here. 2. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 9:00 pm
The law codified the ‘ABC Test’[1] which had been applied by the California Supreme Court in Dynamex Operations West Inc. v Superior Court of Los Angeles ((2018) 4 Cal.5th 903). [read post]
1 Jan 2009, 9:26 am
In summarizing the Puerto case, the court stated: The right of privacy in the California Constitution (art. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 12:51 pm
Superior Court, 17 Cal. 4th 119 (1998), which held that non-California attorneys who appear in California arbitration proceedings are engaged in the unauthorized practice of law. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 7:14 am
"The action at issue was filed in the California Superior Court, challenging statements made in a software company's IPO registration statement and bringing claims under Securities Act Sections 11, 12(a)(2), and 15. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 6:00 am
A recent case in Los Angeles Superior Court, Ncp Imperial v. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 7:00 am
Superior Court, 42 Cal.4th 443 (2007), cert. denied sub nom Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 8:00 am
The California Supreme Court has scheduled oral argument in Iskanian v. [read post]
