Search for: "State of Montana v. United States"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,071
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm
Montana maintains that the state supreme court’s ruling does not conflict with Citizens United. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 9:33 am
See Western Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 3:05 pm
The Montana Supreme Court, finding significant differences between the scope of the federal law at issue in Citizens United and Montana’s state ban on corporation spending, upheld the state restrictions. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 6:15 am
The Montana Supreme Court upheld the ban in December, but three Montana corporations have asked the Supreme Court to stay the enforcement of that decision and, eventually, reverse it, on the ground that the lower court’s ruling conflicts with the Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 3:11 pm
Kennedy is studying a request by three Montana corporations to strike down, without further briefing and oral argument, the state law on the premise that the Montana Supreme Court in upholding it simply failed to follow the Court’s 2010 ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:28 am
District Judge Donald Molloy in which he predicted that the Montana Supreme Court decision affirming the state’s ban on independent corporate expenditures in the face of the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision, is “unlikely to stand. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:58 am
The measure at issue is nearly identical to the ban in federal law struck down in Citizens United v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 2:10 pm
In December of last year, the Montana Supreme Court found Citizens United v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 11:40 am
Today the James Madison Center filed this application for a stay of the Montana Supreme Court ruling upholding state law barring corporate independent spending in state elections. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 10:56 am
The state court ruling, the new filing argued, is so flatly contradictory to the Citizens United v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 9:08 am
The state high court held that Citizens United did not control because the state ban was justified by the state’s unique history of corporate corruption and influence in Montana politics. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 11:58 am
Last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 1:19 pm
Supreme Court decision regarding GPS tracking in United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:45 am
At the San Jose Mercury News, Howard Mintz discusses United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:45 am
At the San Jose Mercury News, Howard Mintz discusses United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
On the same date HHJ Parkes QC heard a “Norwich Pharmacal” application in the case of Patel v Unite. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 7:03 am
United States, 2012 U.S. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 8:27 am
In a Dec. 30 opinion, the Montana Supreme Court upheld a state law barring corporate spending to support or oppose political candidates or parties, saying Citizens United only applies to federal elections. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 6:46 am
The Anaconda corporation controlled the state during a significant portion of Montana’s history and the statute is, evidently a response to that control. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 5:50 pm
On the federal front, the Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
