Search for: "State v. State Board of Equalization"
Results 781 - 800
of 3,914
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2012, 12:13 pm
The federal district court, southern district of New York, has raised doubts about the facts asserted in the case of United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 3:01 pm
County (2013) and NFIB v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 10:38 am
Plaintiffs dropped their lawsuit after Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar issued guidance on Sept. 11, prohibiting all of the state’s county boards of elections from rejecting returned absentee or mail ballots “based solely on signature analysis. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 7:45 pm
Dean v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm
Board of Education and the companion cases that followed, held that "separate was not equal," and state laws that required separation between the races in schools, offended both Equal Protection and Due Process. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 11:43 pm
[Jackson v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:25 pm
In United States v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 6:30 am
Parity is the state or condition of being equal, and addresses the inherited inequalities of pay, status, or political representation. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 10:32 am
Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2024, 11:55 am
U.S. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 8:10 am
Miller puts closely-held corporations in a particularly bad place, allowing corporate funds to be “pilfered to fund family feuds and board arguments without any regard to fiduciary obligations or safeguards for the corporate interest” unless they choose to opt out of advancement, an option that could be equally harmful to the corporation. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 5:35 am
Board of Education — striking down Plessy v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 11:40 am
Comstock also could have obtained equally lucrative pay packages in other deals C&J mulled.C&J’s board also understood that Nabors would need to gain control of the surviving entity in order to bring about a tax-driven domicile change to Bermuda. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 4:05 pm
In the case of the Bresten v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
Board of Educationwas met with persistent and orchestrated resistance. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 12:00 am
MITCHELL v. [read post]
Del. high court says undisclosed post-merger role made Tower CEO self-interested, board ill informed
12 Jul 2020, 5:40 pm
July 25, 2019) The majority of the en banc court said at the motion-to-dismiss stage, the undisclosed prospect of a post-merger CEO job with a five-fold pay increase for Towers’ lead negotiator would have been a conflict-of-interest concern if revealed to his board – especially since Haley subsequently supported a minimum price increase , Justice Karen Valihura, writing for the majority, said the high court’s standard for a duty of candor charge, stated in… [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:45 am
In Middleton v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 9:38 am
Equality v. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 7:32 pm
Target Corp. v. [read post]
