Search for: "State v. State Board of Equalization" Results 781 - 800 of 4,256
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2009, 8:44 am
 Finally, Justice Corrigan would hold that these outcomes do not violate the double jeopardy, due process, or equal protection clauses of the United States and Michigan constitutions. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:34 am by Dr Jeremias Prassl
The case had attracted significant interest domestically and internationally, with the claimant supported by the Equality and Human Rights Commission, and the Secretary of State for Transport intervening on his behalf. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 7:04 am by Elin Hofverberg
Finally, the Board considered equality and non-discrimination, as any restrictions on expression must respect the principle of equality and non-discrimination. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 5:14 am by Frank Cranmer
The Federation’s board told her that it did not consent to her doing so and she withdrew her candidature. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 12:49 pm by Stephen D. Rosenberg
Greater clarity on the application of the six year limitation period would be a boon to ERISA practitioners across the board. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 6:32 am
  That pressure has only grown following the Supreme Court’s recent decision against affirmative action in SFFA v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 6:32 am
  That pressure has only grown following the Supreme Court’s recent decision against affirmative action in SFFA v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:55 am by Patricia Salkin
Accordingly, Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Complaint was granted as to Plaintiffs’ Sixth Cause of Action, and the action was stayed pending determination of the Article 78 proceeding in New York state court East End Eruv Association, Inc v Town of Southampton, 2014 WL 4826226 (EDNY 9/24/2014) The Order can be accessed at: https://www.docketalarm.com/cases/New_York_Eastern_District_Court/2–13-cv-04810/East_End_Eruv_Association_Inc. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:55 am by Patricia Salkin
Accordingly, Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Complaint was granted as to Plaintiffs’ Sixth Cause of Action, and the action was stayed pending determination of the Article 78 proceeding in New York state court East End Eruv Association, Inc v Town of Southampton, 2014 WL 4826226 (EDNY 9/24/2014) The Order can be accessed at: https://www.docketalarm.com/cases/New_York_Eastern_District_Court/2–13-cv-04810/East_End_Eruv_Association_Inc. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:19 am by Blog Editorial
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 12:50 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 23848 (ED CA, March 15, 2010), a California federal magistrate judge concluded that inmates failed to state a claim against the California State Personnel Board in connection with their complaint that no Wiccan prison chaplains were hired for their facility.In Jackson v. [read post]