Search for: "United States v. Contents of Account"
Results 781 - 800
of 2,859
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2018, 4:09 pm
In March, in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 5:00 am
The court reasoned that `the NCIS Director has a direct reporting relationship to the Chief of the Naval Operations, a military officer,’ and so `[d]espite a civilian Director, the NCIS continues to be a unit of, and accountable to, the Navy. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
Kelo v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 12:52 pm
Because that account was associated with the S.B. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 12:27 pm
--Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third CircuitOpinion Date: 4/12/11Cite: Figueroa v. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
See United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 5:49 am
Indeed, Facebook allocates 87 percent of its misinformation budget to the United States and Canada alone. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 9:50 am
Duty of Platforms to Combat Fraud: Finally, witnesses expressed concern over the lack of action taken by platforms to screen out fraudulent content. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:05 am
Since Google LLC is domiciled in the United States, Mr Lloyd required permission to serve out under CPR 6.36, relying on the gateway contained in CPR PD6B – 3.1(9) i.e., claims in tort where damage was sustained, or will be sustained, within the jurisdiction. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 7:47 am
Also: It is difficult to conceive of how online user reviews – at least in their current form – could continue to exist in the United States without Section 230. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 3:43 am
It is also questionable whether the Court was correct in stating that consumer perception will only be relevant in certain circumstances, when the CJEU stated at least twice in Louboutin (at least in the English translation – see paras 43 and 48) that it was ‘necessary’, in order to determine whether a marketplace operator makes ‘use’ of a sign, to assess consumer perception. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 2:15 am
The “Complainant has offered no evidence to show what outreach its services have outside of the United States and, in particular, what, if any, business it does in Luxembourg, where the Respondent is located. [read post]
22 Jan 2025, 7:25 am
Simon (Joyce) v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 8:02 am
If that’s CDCR’s argument, it’s plainly wrong: in United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 2:10 pm
A recent United States Supreme Court decision, City of Ontario v. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 12:14 am
United Kingdom (2009) 48 EHRR 50, at [66]; Von Hannover v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:51 am
The judge stated that the contents of the statement were crucial to the prosecution on count one as there was no other direct evidence of what had taken place. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 12:44 pm
Much is being reported in the media about the decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California certifying a class of drivers for the Uber ride service who contended that they were employees, not independent contractors. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
Pix Credit hereWhile interest in this case, HKSAR v Lai Man Ling [2022] 4 HKC 410, [2022] HKDC 355, reported in September 2022, may be diminishing, its relevance requires sustained examination. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 2:42 pm
On appeal, Plaintiff–Appellant the United States (`Government’) argues that reversal is necessary because the district court applied the wrong legal standard in determining that Krueger established prejudice.U.S. v. [read post]
