Search for: "United States v. London"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,914
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2015, 7:30 am
Cases from your El-Masri v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:59 am
Lifestyle Equities C.V. and another v Ahmed and another, heard 20th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March 2023 R (on the application of Toraane and another) v… [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 12:33 am
He summarised the position as follows: “It is therefore taken as a constitutional gospel in all commonwealth jurisdictions and also the United States that courts have no business handling religious questions. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
However, last week’s High Court, England and Wales, ruling in Enterprise v Europcar [2015] EWHC 300 (Ch) shows this is by no means a settled area, explains katfriend Jeremy Blum(Bristows LLP).* The Richemont ruling and beyond: dealing with counterfeit websites and the intermediaries that host themKatfriend Tim Behean provides another insightful analysis of Cartier International AG and Others v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd and Others [2014] EWHC 3354… [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:13 am
In March 2004 the arbitration panel ruled in favor of Hancock, and the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, confirmed the award a few months later. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:12 am
Aiyer’s judicial dictionary : a complete law lexicon Nagpur : LexisNexis Butterworths Wadhwa, 2011 2 v. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm
United States In South Carolina the case of Charleston City Paper has confirmed libel law principles, Blog Law Online comments. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 10:30 am
USA: Skidmore v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 1:21 pm
Any injuries he suffered occurred in Russia and could not constitute a domestic injury in the United States. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm
United States On 22 January 2019 the US Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to take up an appeal in Hassell v. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 4:20 pm
United States California has implemented new blockchain legislation, a move which has drawn commentary from the Hunton Andrews Kurth Blog. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 12:31 am
Closer to home, a team from 1 Crown Office Row is walking the London Legal Walk to raise funds for the London Legal Support Trust, the Free Representation Unit and the Bar Pro Bono Unit, so if you like the UKHRB, please sponsor them here. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 3:37 pm
*********************************************************The Melia White House Hotel, just round the corner from London's Regents Park, holds many happy childhood memories for this Kat, who in the late 1950s and early 1960s was just a curious kitten. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 3:46 am
Scarcely less sad is the scrap over the annotated statute laws of the State of Georgia, recorded by Andy Johnstone on the same weblog. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 11:39 am
Finally, Monday’s grant of certiorari in United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 3:02 pm
” Khamenei also accused the United States of trying to divide Iraq along sectarian lines and urged Iraqis to oppose any such U.S. efforts. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 8:13 am
It sounds as if there were some middle men that the CDC contracted with to get these substances from a foreign country into the United States. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
In a study published in Regulation & Governance, Alberto Asquer, senior lecturer at SOAS University of London and Inna Krachkovskaya, research associate at SOAS University London, compared the European Union’s and the United States’ regulatory responses to CRISPR gene editing and proposed a new model for regulatory development. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:58 am
Supreme Court in connection with Morrison v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 11:33 am
'" It said "the literal interpretation of the concept of public use which the petitioners urge us to apply was abandoned long before the United States Supreme Court concluded [in Kelo v City of New London (545 US 469 [2005])] that the use of eminent domain to carry out an economic development plan does not violate the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution.. [read post]
