Search for: "Wood v. State" Results 781 - 800 of 2,723
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2016, 7:33 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The PATA states that New York law governs the interpretation of its terms, J.A. 219, and under that law we review the District Court’s interpretation of the PATA de novo, Dreisinger v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Thus, the conclusory allegations against [him] are insufficient to survive a Rule 12(b)(6) analysis and, as such, [he] has been fraudulently joined and should be dismissed.Id. at *3.A similar ruling from our neck of the woods (Pennsylvania) occurred in Positive Results Marketing, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 7:23 am by B.W. Barnett
Jackson stated that he stole approximately $8,000 and fled through the woods. [read post]
15 May 2009, 7:00 am
Eric Posner has analyzed the court opinion rating numbers and thinks Diane Wood is looking good. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 9:47 am
Wood, decided Sept. 14 by a 5-4 vote with one abstention. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 12:31 pm
This up-to-date analysis includes: A practical explanation of Section 468B settlement funds; When and how to use them; Statutory and regulatory background for designated settlement funds (DSFs) and qualified settlement funds (QSFs); Discussion of the Tenth Circuit decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 8:56 am by Allred & Allred
Additional Resources: Alabama Supreme Court Upholds $15M Verdict in Dram Shop Act Lawsuit, Nov. 24, 2015, Insurance Journal More Blog Entries: Wood v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 11:09 am by Wells Bennett
Fresh from the Guantanamo security scrub: an amended docketing order for the upcoming hearing, late this month, in United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
More recently, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled in favor of the defendant in Wood v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
NCAA: Anti-Commandeering or Bust” [Jonathan Wood and Shapiro, earlier here and here] “Supreme Court’s Sports Betting Case Could Redefine Relationship between Feds and States” [Shapiro] Federal courts were politicized before the Federalist Society came along, and promoting the cause of textualism helps de-politicize them [Roger Pilon] SCOTUS should use Janus v. [read post]