Search for: "Labelle v. State"
Results 7981 - 8000
of 8,034
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2009, 4:42 pm
— Imelda V. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 12:25 pm
** District Court Judge Construes Campbell-Ewald Giving Daylight to Defendants Wanting to Moot Class Claims… [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 12:23 pm
Earliest surveys—1921 Coca-Cola v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 4:57 am
If one class of proteins has more activity than the other class, an abnormal state exists and a person becomes either at risk of excessive clotting (thrombosis) or excessive bleeding. [read post]
10 Dec 2024, 10:54 am
The obligation applies equally to state and non-state actors …. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 5:49 am
Since 1990, museums had designated thousands of remains and objects as culturally unidentifiable – a label for when the museum is unable to identify a culturally affiliated tribe or lineal descendent for repatriation.[20] However, museums often resorted to this designation too quickly or without sufficient research, allowing the museum to keep the remains or objects in perpetuity and leaving the repatriation in a legal limbo.[21] Under the new regulation, museums and other… [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 6:30 am
For example, perhaps a capitalist state will pass pro-labor legislation that cuts into profits and slows down capital accumulation. [read post]
23 Oct 2010, 9:51 pm
Let me narrate the brief factual background of this case: On April 28, 2010, the Philippine Supreme Court issued its decision in Isabelita Vinuya et al. v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:12 am
The Supreme Court in Surya Devi Rai v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 9:22 am
Thus, the Office would be required to provide independent periodic reports to Congress on the state of the financial system. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:11 am
A few weeks back, I posted a long blog post about Elena Kagan's scholarship and what it suggests about her views on Citizens United and the constitutionality of standard media regulation. [read post]
6 Jan 2025, 9:07 am
Supreme Court’s June 2024 decision in the SEC v. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 9:00 am
FDA stated that in determining whether the app met the definition of a medical device, FDA would look to the intended use of the app (as shown by labeling claims, advertising materials, or oral or written statements by manufacturers or their representatives). [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 6:40 am
Coty Inc. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 1:36 am
” It cites Basic Inc v Levinson (1988) for the proposition that “information is considered material if there is a substantial likelihood that a reasonable investor would consider it important in making an investment decision or if the information would significantly alter the total mix of information made available. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 5:55 am
Two state troopers, Lt. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 6:07 pm
The Supreme Court’s recent King v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:41 pm
” Take care with that social media duty of care October 2018: “[Rhodes v OPO] aptly illustrates the caution that has to be exercised in applying physical world concepts of harm, injury and safety to communication and speech, even before considering the further step of imposing a duty of care on a platform to take steps to reduce the risk of their occurrence as between third parties, or the yet further step of appointing a regulator to superintend the platform’s… [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am
‘Now is the time to reassess presumption of parental involvement’, writes Lea Levine in the April issue of the journal[1]. [read post]
