Search for: "Long v. United States" Results 7981 - 8000 of 20,285
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2015, 7:22 am
The district court did not expressly state whether Gladding or the government had the burden of proof on the motion. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 12:26 am by Nassiri Law
Rideshare companies may compete fiercely on the road, but when it comes to classifying drivers as employees, they are rock-solid united. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 12:00 am
Instead, in the case of United States of America v. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 9:31 pm by Patrick S. O'Donnell
The court noted that ‘the near-universal and firmly established common-law rule in the United States flatly prohibited the admission of juror testimony to impeach a jury verdict. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 12:00 am
Instead, in the case of United States of America v. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 5:23 pm by INFORRM
Some of the background can be found in an article entitled “Right of Reply: A Comparative Approach“  by Andras Koltay, who also discusses the position in the United States and Canada. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 4:14 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
(b) Any person may sue for the penalty, in which event one-half shall go to the person suing and the other to the use of the United States. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
As a result of serious medical conditions, he began receiving long-term disability payments in 1989. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 6:58 pm by Sam Ritchie, ACLU
United States: Two new lawsuits, filed in Connecticut and New York, challenging the Defense of Marriage Act now offer the president a chance to put the government on the side of justice. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 5:00 am
During that year 33,461 divorces were granted in the United States. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 10:34 am by Dennis Crouch
That would be an unfortunately crabbed view of the Conference’s statutory authority to “prescribe general rules of practice and procedure . . . in the United States district courts. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 3:32 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
When a DACA recipient who has been unlawfully present in the United States for a lengthy period of time leaves the United States to apply for an employment-based visa at a U.S. consulate abroad, they are likely to trigger the 3- or 10-year bars pursuant to INA § 212(a)(9)(B).Under INA § 212(a)(9)(B)(i)(I) a person who is unlawfully present for more than 180 days but less than 1 year, and who voluntarily departs the US prior to the commencement of… [read post]