Search for: "Powers v. Powers"
Results 7981 - 8000
of 55,734
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2021, 1:31 pm
Congress recognized how much power it was giving copyright owners in this scheme, so it tried to curb takedown notice abuse in a few ways. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 11:47 am
It is the takings clause, which regulates the power of eminent domain. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 11:37 am
FDA v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 10:36 am
In Torres v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 10:33 am
Neumann v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 4:27 am
States can of course create rights going beyond those protected by the Convention, but their power to do so exists independently of the Convention and is subject to their own established constitutional principles. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 4:00 am
That decision was upheld by the Federal Court of Appeal in 3510395 Canada Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 12:01 am
Knolls Atomic Power Lab, 2008, Gomez-Perez v. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 2:00 pm
It turns out that the pandemic provided political cover for those powerful lobbyists and the Australian Government to target a series of adverse changes to the Australian class action regime. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 9:46 am
Domain: first-party v. third-party cookies, i.e., the entity storing the cookie on the device: First-party cookies are set by the web server of the visited page and share the same domain. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 4:00 am
Pronouns are currently a hot topic in the legal profession, following recent measures by Canadian courts to prevent the misgendering of courtroom participants. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 3:37 am
[1] See media release here. [2] Zoom Communications v Broadcast Solutions Pte Ltd [2014] 4 SLR 500 (CA). [3] Cap 39A. [4] Supreme Court Practice Directions 2021 (To be read with Rules of Court 2021), p 72. [5] Ibid, pp 72-73. [6] Rules of Court, Order 11 rule 1(d). [7] ‘A claim is made for a declaration that no contract exists …’. [8] Li Shengwu v Attorney-General [2019] 1 SLR 1081 (CA). [9] Ibid, [168]-[170]. [10] Ibid, [161]. [11] Rules of Court 2021,… [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 1:00 am
Kamal v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm
You can read the judgments at first instance, in the High Court (Tickle v Griffiths [2021] EWHC 3365 (Fam)) and from the Court of Appeal (Griffiths v Tickle [2021] EWCA Civ 1882) here. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 10:36 am
Winterville and Irizarry v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 8:58 am
And motivated by their success in overturning Roe, some in the pro-life movement may well feel that this is a power that should be exercised. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:32 am
ARTICLE 19 has issued a new policy to address the excessive market power of large social media platforms. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:44 pm
(The ICJ itself has no coercive power.) [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm
Their large size obviates many concerns about power to detect rare disease outcomes. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 9:49 am
Termhouse (Clarendon Court) Management Ltd v Al-Balhaa (2021) EWCA Civ 1881 The First Tier Tribunal has now power to enforce its decisions. [read post]
