Search for: "United States v. California" Results 7981 - 8000 of 13,840
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2013, 1:07 pm by Michael Lowe
This month, the Attorney General has asked the United States Supreme Court to overturn the First Circuit Court of Appeals’ reasoning and decision in an 2013 appeal before the High Court, United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 12:06 pm by Florian Mueller
The other two attack vectors relate to reexaminations of two patents-in-suit.Meanwhile the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has decided to reexamine another patent found infringed by Samsung at last year's trial, as well as a patent Apple asserted against Samsung at the ITC (unsuccessfully so, but it could still pursue this assertion on appeal). [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 12:35 pm
 Even more so given that the overwhelming majority of criminal cases end with plea bargains.The California Supreme Court decides the issue. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Supreme Court Order (01/11/12): In light of the United States Supreme Court's order vacating our judgment in the above-entitled case and remanding the cause to this court "for further consideration in light of AT&T Mobility LLC. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 9:47 am by Sheppard Mullin
United States, 337 U.S. 293 (1949) (“Standard Stations”) the Supreme Court devised what has become known as the “quantitative substantiality” test. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 8:47 am by Don T. Hibner, Jr.
United States, 337 U.S. 293 (1949) (“Standard Stations”) the Supreme Court devised what has become known as the “quantitative substantiality” test. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 8:06 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Cover of Chubby Checker"Let's Twist Again," is the battle cry of 71-year-old Rock 'n Roll legend Chubby Checker after United States District Court for the Northern District of California Judge William H. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 10:09 pm by Orin Kerr
Second, last Thursday, DOJ filed this cert petition in United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 11:28 am by Michael B. Stack
  Read more…       Despite State Court Order, NJ Federal Court Finds Plaintiff Responsible for Conditional Payments   On June 12, 2013, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey published its opinion in Taransky v. [read post]