Search for: "In re E.G."
Results 8001 - 8020
of 13,705
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2010, 10:53 am
See, e.g., In re Boston Beer Co., 198 F.3d 1370, 1372 (Fed. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 6:11 am
As a parent, I learned that often punishing a child for misbehavior punishes the adults as much as the kid (e.g., when she's grounded, I had to stay home too; punishments must be implemented, and doing so is the suckiest part of parenting). [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 7:11 am
In Washington, my interest in law school was re-ignited by working with a number of smart, dedicated lawyers. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 8:29 am
” In re Impounded Case, 840 F.2d 196, 200 (3d Cir. 1988) (citing Christine, 687 F.2d at 753). [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 6:33 am
These are not all trademark or design cases as the category includes copyright, and they are not all the cases as some e.g. relating to exhaustion are included in other categories such as free movement of goods. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 5:25 am
You’re on trial: Is it better to be an atheist or a black radical Muslim lesbian? [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 3:44 am
Judge Wikeley sent the matter back to the first tier tribunal for a re-hearing with his views on a number of different points concerning when the link between IS and HB assessments can be broken. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 8:20 pm
This type of sexual harassment occurs when an employee is required to submit to a supervisor’s sexual advances as a condition of employment (e.g., “sleep with me or you’re fired”). [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 2:15 am
There are also other restrictions on the type of work minors can perform, e.g., no work defined as “hazardous. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 4:00 am
In addition to arguments to present to the judge (e.g., "Judge, we all know that lawyer arguments are not facts" and "my client will testify, anyway" (not all parties testify)) to keep doing first person storytelling, two related cases were mentioned: In People v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 12:13 pm
The wireless market isn’t static; the disappearance of T-Mobile as an independent entity (which may well occur regardless of whether this deal goes through) hardly means we’re forever “doomed” to live with 3 nationwide wireless players. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 3:04 pm
But it is also — my re-thinking this a bit — perfectly plausible that aliens deal with individual states. [read post]
10 May 2012, 5:49 pm
See, e.g., James v. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 8:09 pm
” (2016 WL 4249914, at *3 citing In re Bluetooth Headset Prods. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 4:51 pm
A re-design of this scheme, which allows the participation of smaller players as well as large organisations, is essential, in my view. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:18 am
Reid and his party re-rigged the rules so that it took only 51. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 2:58 pm
See, e.g., Smith v. [read post]
8 Sep 2007, 9:04 am
JACK GOLDSMITH:You're right; I don't impugn the integrity of anyone. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 3:30 am
When employees use the N-word, you use the F-word, as in “You’re fired. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 10:09 am
Perhaps we do need to parse the column into smaller bites — e.g., Small Law in Small Towns; Small Law in Big Cities; Solo Practitioners Only. [read post]
