Search for: "People v Goode" Results 8001 - 8020 of 22,582
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2017, 4:48 am by Mike Madison
Some people are cheering and some people are shrugging in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision last week in Star Athletica v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 3:46 am by SHG
Our in-group is good. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Canada The case of Hudspeth v Whatcott 2017 ONSC 1708 concerned a proposed class action on behalf of 500,000 people who marched on the 2016 Pride Toronto Parade. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 6:00 am by Quinta Jurecic
This question—and the case behind it, McCreary County v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 5:15 am by SHG
Does that make us horrible people? [read post]
25 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by Racine Olson
Erickson, Attorney I truly believe that most people have good intentions. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 3:02 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  41% said Pretzel Crisp was a brand, 41% said common name.Is it good enough if you exclude 1/3 of the people being tested? [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 2:04 pm by Helen Klein Murillo
He begins with a note about labels: “our law punishes people for what they do, not who they are or what they are labeled. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 10:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Any general claims about distinctiveness must take into account: eligibility for protection/scope of protection; reality v. policy; words v. non-words; perception by single consumers v. aggregate; consumer search costs approach v. product goodwill approach; US v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 6:08 am by Sarah Tate Chambers
This is for a very good reason: though lower courts are sorting out this question, the district court in Ackerman never touched this argument. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:00 am by Heather Gray-Grant
It’s different working with someone who prefers logic and consistency v. those who focus instead on the people and circumstances. [read post]