Search for: "The United States, Petitioner"
Results 8001 - 8020
of 8,963
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2009, 7:13 am
" Arguing for respondent United States, Deputy Solicitor General Michael Dreeben began by emphasizing that the Court developed the McNabb-Mallory rule prior to Miranda, when there was no constitutional law requiring that suspects be advised of their rights. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 6:51 am
United States, 2009 U.S. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 8:35 pm
The sentencing court clearly applied a presumption of reasonableness to petitioner's Guidelines range, and the circuit court affirmed. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 11:40 am
The United States Tax Court gave an unwelcome Christmas present to William Magdalin, who was appealing the Internal Revenue Service's refusal to allow his medical deduction for expenses incurred in the conception and birth of his two children by gestational surrogacy. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 11:17 am
United States, which recognized district courts' authority to vary from the crack guidelines based solely on a policy disagreement, and not simply on individualized determination that guidelines yield excessive sentence in a particular caseReported at 21 Fla. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 6:04 am
However, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals threw out the Eisenstein case, holding that: "...where the United States has declined to intervene in a False Claims action, the United States is not a party to the action...therefore a notice of appeal must be filed in 30 days. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 1:17 pm
”On of the losing plaintiffs in this case has filed a lawsuit in the United State District Court for the District of New Jersey seeking to force the NJ Department of Human Services and Division of Medical Assistance and Health Services to change this policy and permit Medicaid eligibility. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 3:36 pm
In doing so, petitioners were operating on an erroneous premise. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 5:48 am
The remaining arguments concerning federal law [the Newlands Resolution and similar federal statutes, and the Admission Act] presented by petitioners and the United States are not properly before the Court and in any event lack merit.As expected, it appears to minimize the extent to which the state Supreme Court relied on the federal Apology Resolution for its decision blocking the sale of lands. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 11:38 am
The exhibit consists of photographs of a United States mailbox labeled to indicate that mail is collected at 4:45 p.m. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 5:23 pm
Revisiting precedent is particularly appropriate where, as here, a departure would not upset settled expectations, see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 8:22 am
But, the RIAA argues, allowing recording conflicts with the policies of the Judicial Conference of the United States. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 4:41 pm
The United States had prosecuted the taxpayers on the grounds that they had committed criminal fraud by filing false 1996 tax returns. but at trial the taxpayers were acquitted of all criminal charges. [read post]
18 Jan 2009, 2:18 am
United States, 377 U.S. 201 (1964), and United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2009, 9:00 pm
United States (08-108) and Arthur Andersen LLP, et al. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2009, 1:48 pm
See United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 10:09 pm
The nurses retained Vinluan to represent them after the promises made to them in order to get them to come to the United States to work for SentosaCare were quickly forgotten, and they were subject to abusive working conditions. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 11:11 am
(in support of petitioner) __________________ Docket: 08-479 Title: Safford United School District #1 v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 5:30 am
" Accordingly, a first professional degree within the United States includes a Doctor of Medicine (M.D.). [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 5:15 am
Why did the President of the United States choose instead to deliberately violate federal law? [read post]
