Search for: "True v. United States"
Results 8001 - 8020
of 9,199
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2020, 11:57 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 2:51 pm
Article I, section 2, clause 3 requires that an "actual Enumeration shall be made within three years after the first meeting of the Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent term of ten years, in such manner as they shall by law direct. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 9:30 pm
The Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS) sponsored a new study to examine this problem, and it recently issued a new recommendation based on that study. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 9:59 am
From an FBI Affidavit in U.S. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 4:12 am
In United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 9:19 pm
But by treating "houses of worship" as the units from which to sample, a disproportionately heavy representation of Christians is the inev [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 7:01 pm
MunchkinPAC-MAN was originally developed and sold by Namco, but Atari and Midway owned the exclusive rights within the United States. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 7:14 am
As it happens, a week before the Florida court decision, an Illinois appellate court handed down a decision in Schneider v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 5:44 am
In other words, assume countries A and B have concluded a PTA in accordance with Article V GATS. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 5:44 am
In other words, assume countries A and B have concluded a PTA in accordance with Article V GATS. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 12:37 pm
Nguyen v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 5:54 pm
From today's decision of the Minnesota Court of Appeals in Johnson v. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 6:05 am
Habib, who is Australian, had been one of the four petitioners in Rasul v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 4:43 am
It seems highly likely that Justice Stevens was assigned only two majority opinions to write from the first three sittings because Stevens was also writing the principal dissent in Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 9:00 am
United States and Carter v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 4:35 pm
State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2019, 9:01 pm
United States case) is a bit more complicated than might appear at first blush.Let’s start with a simple part: to the extent that the president was asserting that he could seek review of any impeachment proceedings directly in the Supreme Court before any lower court had looked at the matter, his assertion would run smack dab into the most venerable of Supreme Court rulings, the 1803 case of Marbury v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 8:28 am
To that I would respond that I have read many communications apparently from you that either state explicitly that you are an attorney ("I am an attorney if that helps you sleep at night" [http://whitecoatunderground.com/2011/12/01/when-did-the-burzynski-clinic-start-harassing-bloggers/]) to ones where you imply that you are an attorney ("So, when I present to the juror that my client and his cancer treatment has went up against 5 Grand Juries which involved the Food and Drug… [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
We believe there is merit in more broadly exploring what the United States can learn from comparative administrative law in general. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 6:52 am
Whitaker v. [read post]
