Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 8001 - 8020
of 13,840
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2013, 6:55 am
Earlier this month, the California Supreme Court provided some guidance on the issue in Rose v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 5:01 am
In Bernal v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 1:54 am
In late July the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued a "final" (but not final-final) Office action rejecting all claims of the '915 patent. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 7:19 pm
Dukes v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 10:08 am
At least in the case of school facilities, we know from the recent decision in Cresta Bella, LP v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 6:00 am
The Ninth Circuit opinion in Salameh v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 4:34 am
PCAOB Chairman Doty remarked that the proposed standards - running to almost 300 pages - mark a "watershed moment" for auditing in the United States. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
Staying with the context of antitrust law, take the example of FTC v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 6:47 am
The bankruptcy court received substantial briefing on the BAP’s published decision in Tsurukawa v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 6:47 am
The bankruptcy court received substantial briefing on the BAP’s published decision in Tsurukawa v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 6:47 am
The bankruptcy court received substantial briefing on the BAP’s published decision in Tsurukawa v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 5:21 am
In the first decision of its kind in the Ninth Circuit, Judge Charles Breyer of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted Seyfarth’s early motion to deny class certification under Rule 23 (before any discovery) [here] thereby killing the copycat class action. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 11:42 am
Citizens United v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:30 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:18 am
Waxman), and certain Democratic Members of the United States House of Representatives (Paul M. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 7:44 am
” In the wake of the Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 11:11 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 1:24 pm
On Remand From The United States Supreme Court [In Los Angeles Cnty. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 12:22 pm
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California denied Sequenom’s motion for a preliminary injunction to prevent Ariosa from making, using, or selling that test. [read post]