Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 8021 - 8040
of 13,899
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2012, 8:37 am
Abbott Flanders v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 7:36 am
Varga on this website) Veteran Representation at CAVC: Chris Attig, Attig | Steel, PLLC (link to bio on this website) Board of Veterans Appeals Veterans Law Judge: Michael Martin VA Regional Office: St. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 11:51 am
Although June Medical v. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 1:36 pm
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 11:16 am
" This provision was interpreted by the Supreme Court in its 2006 decision Woodford v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 1:44 am
It's the EPO": More Munich mewsings from Merpel Merpel has it from an unimpeachable source that earlier last week, there was an informal get-together of European Patent Office's Administrative Council chairman. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 12:19 pm
Just yesterday, in Virginia v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 1:45 am
In January, the Supreme Court asked the Obama Administration for input. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:49 am
After exhausting administrative remedies, San Francisco petitioned the U.S. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 3:43 pm
OFFICE OF THE U.S. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 1:03 pm
The case was Dickerson v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 5:30 pm
Letters of administration c.t.a. were issued to the petitioner and LP, the respondent. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 7:39 am
| Roger in troubled Waters Never Too Late 159 [week ending Sunday 6 August] Cross-undertaking in damages - Napp Pharmaceuticals v Sandoz Limited | In memoriam of June Foray: the greatest screen voice whom you probably never heard of, but likely heard | UK Supreme Court holds that grey market sales can be criminal offence | New administrative notice-and-takedown procedure in Greece | Are you XKING kidding me? [read post]
1 May 2012, 5:12 pm
In Kuleana Ku‘ikahi, LLC v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 3:14 pm
The Appeals court reasoned that when a general consent is given, it is “unqualified’ subject only to “reasonableness” citing United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 3:14 pm
The Appeals court reasoned that when a general consent is given, it is “unqualified’ subject only to “reasonableness” citing United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 11:00 am
McLean v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 3:05 pm
Here's a link to the court of appeals case info.PD-0987-09, Richard Lynn Winfrey, Sr. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 2:30 am
The Federal Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Clarification Act of 2009 is too varied and nuanced to even highlight in this space, so I’ve attached the Section-by-Section Analysis from the Office of Legislative Affairs and the Administrative Office of the U.S. [read post]
